Search Results for "Plausible Findings"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Plausible Findings"

730 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 730 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute for Lack of Merit. Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenge fails as no patent illegality or perversity found in award rejecting damages for breach of contract.

30 Jun 2026

The present petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 25th March 2021 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by ONGC Against Upholding of Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Interpretation of Contract Terms and Findings of Fact by Arbitral Tribunal Not Open to Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Apr 2026

The case arises from a commercial arbitration appeal filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) against the judgment of a Single Judge of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Property Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Interpretation of the Development Agreement Was Plausible and Did Not Warrant Setting Aside.

6 Apr 2026

The judgment pertains to a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 30th Sep...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Patent Illegality Found. Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contractual Clauses Held Plausible and Not Open to Interference.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Grounds for Interference Established. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings Were Based on Evidence and Not Perverse, and the Petition Was Barred by Limitation.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside an arbitral ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Interim Application — Appointment of Arbitrator under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute over export credit insurance claim repudiation. The court held that at the stage of Section 11, only the existence of an arbitration agreement is to be examined, not the merits or limitation.

15 Oct 2025

The petitioner, ECGC Limited, filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, along with an interim appl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Demurrage Claim Dispute. Claim for demurrage and detention charges held time-barred under Article 55 of Limitation Act, 1963 as the cause of action arose on completion of discharge, not on subsequent demand.

8 Oct 2025

The Petitioner, National Iranian Tanker Company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging a majorit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Property Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The court upheld the arbitrator's interpretation of the agreement for sale and the direction to refund the amount paid with interest, finding no error in the award.

7 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Vasanji Assaria Mamania, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral awar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Set Aside for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's rejection of the counterclaim without considering evidence and without granting an opportunity to be heard amounted to a patent illegality and breach of natural justice.

4 Feb 2025

The petitioner, Marine Electricals (India) Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to set aside an arbi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition in Commercial Dispute — Appointment of Arbitrator Directed. Court holds that existence of arbitration clause and failure of respondent to appoint arbitrator entitles petitioner to seek appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Carol Info Services Ltd., filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seek...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)