Search Results for "Pensioner"

383 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 383 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Widow Against Recovery of Excess Payment from Deceased Employee's Pension. Recovery from Legal Heirs Based on Employee's Undertaking Held Impermissible as Excess Payment Was Due to Employer's Mistake Without Misrepresentation.

The petitioner, Smt. Sudha wd/o Bhagirath Meshram, is the widow of a deceased employee who worked as a Junior Lecturer at Zilla Parishad High School. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Pension Arrears to Retired Bank Employee Despite Employer's Delay in Remitting Contribution. Employer's Obligation to Forward Pension Papers Cannot Be Withheld Due to Disciplinary Proceedings; Para 5(2) of Pension Scheme Held Ultra Vires to Deny Arrears.

The appellant, Issac T M, was an employee of the Idukki District Co-operative Bank Ltd from 1978 until his superannuation on 31 January 2007. The Gove...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits of Retired Lecturer Under Maharashtra Pension Rules. Petitioner entitled to regular pension, gratuity, commutation, and leave encashment with interest for 30 years 1 month of service in aided colleges.

The petitioner, Dr. (Mrs.) Parvathi Venkatesh, a retired lecturer aged about 60 years, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Minimum Pension of Rs.375 to Pre-1986 Pensioner Absorbed in Public Sector Undertaking. Petitioner entitled to minimum pension under Clause 7.1 read with Clause 10(a) of Office Memorandum dated 16.04.1987 despite having drawn lump sum terminal benefits.

The petitioner, Anthony C. Monteiro, was a government servant in the Department of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services, Goa, as a Junior Stenogra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pensioners' Writ Petitions for Full Pension Benefits Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti Service Rules. Pension is a right, not a bounty, and cannot be withheld or reduced arbitrarily; respondents directed to pay full pension with interest.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by retired employees of Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad, seeking full pension and pensionary benefits...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Income Tax Commissioner's Petition for Full Pension and Retiral Benefits. Rule of 50% Deduction for Less Than 10 Years Qualifying Service Under Rule 49(2)(b) of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 Not Applicable to Petitioner Who Served Over 30 Years.

The petitioner, B.B. Rajendra Prasad, a retired Commissioner of Income Tax, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Central Administrati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Bank Employee's Petition Against Unilateral Withholding of Pension. Pension is a property right and cannot be stopped without show cause notice or disciplinary proceedings under Bank of Maharashtra Pension Regulations.

The petitioner, Devanand s/o Galomal Nichwani, was a computer operator/clerk at Bank of Maharashtra, Jaripatka Branch, Nagpur. He opted for voluntary ...