Search Results for "Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961"

11 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Disability Pension Case for Territorial Army Member - Statutory Regulations Override Departmental Denial. Disability Pension Granted Under Regulation 173 of Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961, as Extended to Territorial Army by Regulation 292, Since Disability Was Attributable to Military Service and Assessed at 80%.

7 Mar 2022

The appeal arose from a dispute over the entitlement of a Territorial Army member to disability pension. The appellant, after serving in the Regular A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Disability Pension Case — Injury During Casual Leave for Private Purpose Not Attributable to Military Service. Court holds that an injury sustained while on casual leave for a private activity (purchasing goods for sister) has no causal connection with military service, reversing the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension.

20 Sep 2019

The case involves an appeal by the Government of India against an order of the Armed Forces Tribunal granting disability pension to Dharambir Singh, a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Armed Forces Pension Case, Upholding Terminal Benefits for Resigning Officer. Late Entrant Eligibility Under Regulation 15 of Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 Applied as Officer Commissioned at Age 39 and Served 15 Years Before Resignation.

30 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from the Armed Forces Tribunal's order directing the Union of India to process terminal and pensionary benefits for a former Army Me...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Armed Forces Tribunal Case, Directs Grant of Disability Pension. Disability pension entitlement upheld as disease leading to discharge presumed attributable to military service under Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, with rounding off to 50% from 01.01.1996, setting aside Tribunal's dismissal based on disability below 20%.

23 Apr 2025

The dispute involved an appeal under the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, concerning the entitlement of a former army personnel to disability pension....

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Disability Pension to Retired Army Personnel in Hypertension Case — Attributability to Military Service Established. Court sets aside Armed Forces Tribunal order, holds that hypertension is a stress-related disease attributable to military service under Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961.

5 Mar 2026

The petitioner, a retired Indian Army personnel, served for 34 years, 5 months, and 4 days before retiring on 31.5.2021. Prior to retirement, a Releas...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Ex-Servicemen's Claims for Full Disability Pension Arrears -- Union of India's Appeal Dismissed -- Judgment in Rem Overrides Limitation Periods for Recurring Pension Rights Under Armed Forces Tribunal Act

12 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court addressed multiple civil appeals concerning arrears of disability pension for ex-servicemen -- The central issue was whether arrears...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Restores Cashiering Sentence in Army Court Martial Case for Outraging Modesty. Court Distinguishes Between Punishment Under Army Act and Pension Forfeiture Under Pension Regulations, Allowing Separate Proceedings for Pension Forfeiture While Restoring Original Sentence.

29 Jul 2020

The dispute originated from a complaint by two women patients against an Army Medical Corps officer alleging inappropriate touching during medical exa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Ex-Havildar's Claim for Ex-Gratia Compensation in Army Disability Case. Discharge During Extended Tenure Under Annexure B Conditions Does Not Qualify as Invalidation for Ex-Gratia Purposes Under Policy Circular Dated 26 December 2011.

1 Jan 2019

The appellant, a former Havildar in the Indian Army, completed his original tenure of 24 years on 27 December 2010 and was granted a two-year extensio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Widow and Children for Family Pension Despite Bigamous Marriage — Second Marriage Valid After Divorce from First Wife, Entitlement to Pensionary Benefits Upheld. The court held that the marriage of appellant No.1 with the deceased, though void at inception due to subsistence of earlier marriage, became valid after the divorce of the first wife, and the appellants are entitled to family pension under the Army Pension Regulations.

22 Aug 2023

The case pertains to a dispute over family pension of Late Subedar Pundalik Bhave, who served in the Indian Army. The appellants are Smt. Shiramabai (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Invalidation Pension Due to Delay and Laches. Sepoy-Driver's Disability Claim Rejected as Not Attributable to Military Service.

14 Jul 2006

The petitioner, Moreshwar Bhalchandra Deshpande, joined the Indian Army as a Sepoy-Driver on 4th February 1981 and was posted in difficult terrains in...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)