Search Results for "PIT NDPS Act 1988"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "PIT NDPS Act 1988"

9 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in PIT-NDPS Case for Lack of Material Linking to Public Order. Detention under Section 3 of PIT-NDPS Act, 1988 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish disturbance to public order.

2 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Sanjaybhai @Center Dhirubhai Rathod, through his wife Pintuben Sanjaybhai Rathod, challenged the preventive detention order dated 06.0...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in PIT-NDPS Case for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. The court held that mere registration of FIRs under the NDPS Act does not justify preventive detention without evidence of impact on public order under Section 3 of the PIT-NDPS Act, 1988.

3 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Kanubhai alias Hariom Budhabhai Gohel, through his son Chiragkumar Gohel, challenged a preventive detention order dated 26.12.2025 pas...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Detention Order Under PIT-NDPS Act for Non-Application of Mind and Procedural Lapses. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside Due to Failure to Consider Pending Bail Application and Unexplained Delay in Forwarding Representation.

3 Jul 2020

The petitioner, a Nigerian national, was detained under Section 3 of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Detention Order Under PIT NDPS Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Live Link. Preventive detention order was invalid as detaining authority failed to consider bail status and relied on stale incidents without contemporary material showing continued prejudicial activity under Section 3(1) of Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988.

30 Sep 2022

The appeal arose from a preventive detention order under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substanc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation — Right Under Article 22(5) Violated. The Court held that the 60-day delay in considering the detenue's representation by the Central Government was unexplained and vitiated the detention order.

15 May 2023

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against a preventive detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activi...

High Court

High Court of Andhra Pradesh Hears Writ Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under PIT NDPS Act for Delay and Non-Consideration of Bail Orders. Detention Order Under Section 3(1) of Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 Examined for Violation of 15-Day Circular Timeline and Ignoring Material Bail Orders.

14 Jul 2026

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by the wife of the detenu seeking a writ of habeas corpus. The detenu was d...

High Court

Kerala High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Order Under PITNDPS Act on Grounds of Unexplained Delay. Detention Order Under Section 3(1) of Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 Based on Last Prejudicial Activity in Crime No.677/2025 Is Scrutinized for Snapping of Live Link.

4 Aug 2026

The matter involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a preventive detention order passed under Section 3(1) ...

High Court

Andhra Pradesh High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petitioner in Preventive Detention Case Due to Non-Consideration of Bail Orders. Detention Under Section 3(1) of PIT NDPS Act, 1988 Set Aside as Bail Orders Were Vital Material Not Placed Before Detaining Authority.

28 Jul 2026

By way of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner sought a writ of habeas corpus and challenged the preventive ...

High Court

Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Challenge to Preventive Detention Under PIT NDPS Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Unexplained Delay of Over Two Months in Considering Detenu's Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution Rendered Continued Detention Illegal.

3 Jul 2026

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati considered a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of habeas corpus against...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)