Search Results for "Output Tax"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Output Tax"

60 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 60 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes GST Appellate Order Against Indian Oil Corporation for Violation of Natural Justice — Pre-deposit Requirement Set Aside. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Reasoned Order Renders Appellate Order Unsustainable Under Section 107(11) of CGST Act, 2017.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioner, M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., a public sector undertaking engaged in storage and supply of petroleum products, filed a writ petitio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Classification Dispute — Multi Function Printers Held Classifiable as Automatic Data Processing Machines Under Entry 84.71. The Court ruled that multi function printers with copying, printing, scanning, and faxing capabilities are classifiable as automatic data processing machines or units thereof under Entry 84.71 of the VAT Notification, not as laser jet printers or under residual entry.

20 Dec 2018

The appellant, Ricoh India Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an appeal under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Vodafone's Appeal on CENVAT Credit for Telecom Towers and Shelters. CENVAT Credit on Towers and Prefabricated Buildings Denied as They Are Immovable Property and Not Capital Goods Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

10 Sep 2015

The Appellant, Vodafone India Ltd., filed appeals under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Petition in Central Excise Rebate Case — By-Product Export Rebate Allowed. Input Credit Adjustment Permitted Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for Duty Paid on Inputs Used in Manufacture of Final Product, Even if By-Product is Not Manufactured.

6 Apr 2011

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Joint Secretary (Revision Ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Service Tax on Onsite Work at Customer's Premises Under Export of Service Rules, 2005. The court held that onsite work at customer's premises abroad qualifies as 'Service Provided from India' under Rule 3(2)(a) of the Export of Service Rules, 2005, and the appellants are entitled to refund of service tax paid.

15 Sep 2014

The case involves appeals by Tech Mahindra Limited and other assessees against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CE...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Competition Commission of India and Kapoor Glass in Abuse of Dominance Case — No Abuse Found in Volume Discounts and Contractual Terms by Dominant Glass Tubing Manufacturer. The court held that volume discounts are not per se abusive under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, and that the evidence did not establish anti-competitive foreclosure or refusal to supply.

30 Jun 2025

The case arises from an information filed by Kapoor Glass India Pvt. Ltd. on 25 May 2010 under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CBDT Action Plan Points System for Tax Recovery as Arbitrary and Unconstitutional. The court struck down the system of awarding points to Income Tax Officers for achieving tax recovery targets, holding it ultra vires the Income Tax Act, 1961 and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

11 Apr 2019

The Bombay High Court, in a judgment dated 11th April 2019, dealt with two petitions challenging a portion of the Central Action Plan for the financia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case for Outdoor Catering Services. Outdoor Catering Service Provided to Factory Employees Held as Input Service Under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Due to Statutory Obligation Under Factories Act, 1948.

25 Oct 2010

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which allowe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Accumulated Input Tax Credit Under Inverted Duty Structure in GST — Rejection by Authorities Set Aside. Held that refund of unutilized ITC is admissible under Section 54(3)(ii) of the CGST Act, 2017 even when output supply is partially exempt, and that the formula under Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules, 2017 must be applied correctly.

23 Apr 2026

The petitioner, CHEC-TPL Line 4 Joint Venture, a joint venture between TATA Projects Limited and another entity, was engaged in the construction of a ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)