Search Results for "Ossification test"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Ossification test"

142 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 142 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Juvenile Justice Board Order Declaring Petitioner as Juvenile on Date of Offence — Age Determination Must Be Based on Earliest Available Documentary Evidence Under Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. The Court held that the Board erred in relying on ossification test and school leaving certificate instead of the earliest birth certificate, setting aside the juvenile declaration.

8 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Kailas Sambhaji Lohakre, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Juvenile Plea in Rape Case — Ossification Test Indicates Age Above 18 Years. Margin of Error Not Applied as Test Conducted Near Incident Date and School Records Not Produced.

14 Dec 2018

The petitioner, Shaikh Azhar @ Shahrukh s/o Shaikh Shikur, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the rejection of hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Children's Court Finding on Juvenile Age Determination in Criminal Appeal — Ossification Test and School Records Considered. The court held that the ossification test indicating age 18-20 years and unreliable school records supported the finding that the appellant was about 18 years on the date of offence under Section 2(k) and (l) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.

6 Apr 2011

The appellant, Raju Pasla, was convicted by the trial court and filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court at Goa. During the appeal, he cla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Minor Cricketer's Petition Challenging Age Determination Test Report. The court quashed the TW-3 test report and directed BCCI and MCA to consider documentary evidence for age verification.

18 Nov 2015

The petitioner, Master Sagar Prakash Chhabria, a minor represented by his father, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Juvenile Plea of Convicted Accused in Rape and Murder Case — School Certificate and Ossification Test Show Majority at Time of Offence. Court Relies on School Leaving Certificate and Bone Age Test to Conclude Applicant Was Above 18 Years on Date of Incident, Rejecting Claim of Juvenility Under Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.

22 Oct 2019

The applicant, Sandip Samadhan Shirsat @ Raghu Rokda, was convicted along with another accused by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, on 11/05/2017 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder but Remits Sentence to Juvenile Board — Appellant Found to Be Juvenile on Date of Offence Under Juvenile Justice Act, 2000. The court accepted the finding that the appellant was a juvenile on the date of the offence based on ossification test and Rule 12(3)(b) of the Juvenile Justice Rules, 2007, and directed the matter to be placed before the Juvenile Justice Board for sentence.

22 Mar 2011

The appellant, Chhotu @ Asif Istraeel Shaikh, was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the Sessions Cour...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Declares Accused Juvenile and Quashes Death Sentence Under Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. Age Determination Based on School Birth Certificate Prevails Over Ossification Test, Leading to Release After Over 5 Years Incarceration as Maximum Sentence for Juvenile Below 16 is 3 Years.

3 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court heard appeals challenging the judgment and order dated 15.11.2018 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which affirmed the death sentenc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Juvenile Age Determination Case — Appellant Entitled to Be Tried as Juvenile Under Juvenile Justice Act, 2000. The court held that in case of doubt regarding age, the benefit must go to the accused, and the school leaving certificate is reliable evidence of age under Section 7A of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.

13 Jul 2010

The appellant, Mohammad Javed Abdul Wahid Shaikh, was convicted for murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment by the Additional ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Age of Victim Determined by Ossification Test and School Records, Consent Irrelevant for Minor.

26 Feb 2018

The appellant, Sujoy @ Sanjay Laltu Chakravarty, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gondia, in Special POCSO Case No. 11/2014 for offences under Sect...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in POCSO Case Due to Flawed Age Determination by Juvenile Justice Board, Directs Fresh Determination. Board Failed to Conduct Mandatory Preliminary Assessment of Age Before Transferring Case to Children's Court, Violating Section 15 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.

11 Mar 2024

The dispute arose from a criminal case involving alleged offences under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and the Protection of Children f...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)