Search Results for "Ordinance 111"

22 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes University's Disapproval of D.Litt. Treatise Due to Bias and Non-Compliance with Ordinance 111. Academic Council's decision set aside for failing to follow prescribed procedure and considering biased examiner report.

The petitioner, Professor Dr. Nayyar P. Siddiqui, a lecturer, submitted a treatise titled 'English and Urdu Poetry: A Parallel Literary Study' for the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to D.Litt. Treatise Disapproval by University Academic Council. Academic Decision Based on Expert Reports Upheld as No Bias or Procedural Violation Established.

The petitioner, Professor Dr. Nayyar P. Siddiqui, filed a writ petition challenging the communication dated 22/9/2005 from the Deputy Registrar (Ph.D....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Students' Petitions Challenging University Attendance Ordinance. Ordinance Requiring 75% Attendance for Examination Eligibility Upheld as Valid Academic Regulation Not Violative of Fundamental Rights.

The petitioners, a group of students from various colleges affiliated with Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, challenged the validity of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Strikes Down FCRA Amendment Act 2020 — Ban on Transfer of Foreign Funds and Mandatory Aadhaar Held Unconstitutional. The court upheld the requirement of a single FCRA account at SBI New Delhi as a reasonable regulatory measure to prevent misuse of foreign funds.

The judgment deals with a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of certain amendments made to the Foreign Contribution (Regu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Rajasthan Discoms Against APTEL Order Granting Change in Law Compensation to Power Generator. Interpretation of PPA Articles 10.2.1 and 10.5.1(ii) regarding supplementary bill and carrying cost is covered by earlier decisions.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal filed by Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. and other Rajasthan Discoms against an order of the Appellate Tribunal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Two Brothers in IT Act Case — IPC Offences Not Maintainable in Light of Section 67 of IT Act. Non-obstante clause in Section 81 of IT Act overrides IPC for offences involving obscene electronic material, following Sharat Babu Digumarti v. Government (NCT of Delhi).

The petitioners, two brothers, filed a criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 86 of 2018 registered at Shahupuri Police Station, Kolhapur,...