Search Results for "Order XXI Rule 32(5) CPC"

8 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in RERA Execution Case, Holding Order XXI Rule 32(5) CPC Applicable. The court set aside the Appellate Tribunal's order disallowing amendment to execution applications seeking construction by decree holders at promoter's cost.

The case involves five second appeals filed by allottees (Rajan Chandiramani, Jagruti Parikh and Anr., Priyanka Waghela, Srichand Makhija, and Jayesh ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision on Auction Sale: Statutory Violations Render Sale Null and Void. Despite recognizing significant procedural breaches, the Supreme Court offers the appellant a chance to retain the industrial property by settling liabilities.

The legality of an auction sale conducted by the Tahsildar and confirmed by the Additional Collector, which was later contested on the grounds of stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Stay of Execution Proceedings in Possession Suit — Order 21 Rule 29 CPC Cannot Be Invoked After Decree Is Passed. Execution Court Erred in Staying Execution Based on Subsequent Suit Filed by Judgment Debtor After Decree.

The petitioners (decree holders) obtained a decree for possession in O.S. No. 79/2003 (originally O.S. No. 3/1971) against the respondent (judgment de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Based on Ex-Parte US Default Judgment — Foreign Decree Not a Debt Under Section 433(e) Companies Act, 1956 Without Satisfying Conditions for Enforcement in India.

The petitioner, Marine Geotechnics LLC, an American company, obtained an ex-parte default judgment against the respondent, Coastal Marine Construction...