Search Results for "Order XIII Rule 1(3)(a) CPC"

4 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides Legal Question on Production of Documents for Cross-Examination of Party Under CPC. The Court Interprets Order XIII Rule 1(3)(a) and Whether a Party is a 'Witness' for Purposes of Confronting with Documents Not Filed Earlier.

This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenged an order dated 28 September 2016 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Divisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Rejection of Amendment to Written Statement in Eviction Suit; No Due Diligence Shown After Commencement of Trial. Tenant's Application to Add Waiver Plea Based on Municipal Tax Payments Fails Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC as Knowledge of Tax Payments Existed Throughout.

The matter arose from a suit for eviction and mesne profits filed by the landlord against the tenant in the Small Causes Court at Mumbai. The landlord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Upholding Eviction: Court Rules in Favor of Landlord Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act" "Conclusive Evidence in Written Agreements Seals Eviction; Jurisdictional and Procedural Claims Dismissed"

The case involves the eviction proceedings under Section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, based on Leave and License Agreements between t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules in Admiralty Jurisdiction Case: Cockette Marine Oil vs. OSV Beas Dolphin. Court Rejects Summary Judgment Amidst Insolvency Proceedings, Highlights Impact of IBC Moratorium on Maritime Claims.

The Bombay High Court, under the Admiralty jurisdiction, considered an application for summary judgment filed by Cockette Marine Oil DMCC against OSV ...