Search Results for "Order 47 Rule 1 CPC"

30 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Review Order Deleting Possession Finding in Property Dispute. The High Court exceeded its review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC by deleting a finding on possession based on non-framing of issue, which was not an error apparent on the face of the record.

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the High Court's order in a review petition that deleted a paragraph from its earlier judgment in a proper...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Review Order in Urban Land Ceiling Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Jurisdiction Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC Cannot Be Used to Re-Examine Factual Findings Like an Appellate Court.

The appeal arose from a review order passed by the Allahabad High Court dismissing a review application filed by the original appellant, Asharfi Devi ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Enforcement Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition Against Dismissal of Civil Appeals Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Rejected as Court Found No Ground for Review Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The Supreme Court of India dismissed review petitions filed by Arun Dev Upadhyaya against the judgment dated 10.08.2021 in Civil Appeal Nos. 8345-8346...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Industrial Dispute Over Bonus Payment — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to errors apparent on face of record; re-argument on merits not permitted.

The judgment concerns a batch of review petitions filed against a common judgment dated 18th December 2013 passed by the Bombay High Court in several ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Property Dispute Over Will — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review under Section 114 CPC read with Order 47 Rule 1 CPC cannot be used to re-argue the case or correct erroneous findings unless there is an error apparent on the face of the record.

The applicants (original appellants) filed a review application under Section 114 read with Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition Against Consent Order Directing Deposit for Children's Education. Court holds that review is not maintainable as no error apparent on record and order was passed with consent.

The case involves a review petition filed by John Vergese (petitioner) seeking review of an order dated 5.11.2004 passed by a learned Single Judge of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter — No Error Apparent on Face of Record in Limitation Finding. Court holds that review jurisdiction under Section 114 CPC and Order 47 Rule 1 is limited to errors apparent on record, not re-appreciation of evidence.

The review petition was filed by Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. (the original respondent no.1 in Arbitration Appeal No. 6 of 2007) seeking review of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Stamp Duty Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record in Order Granting Time to Pay Deficit Stamp Duty. Review Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Ground Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC for Recall of Judgment.

The Review Petition No.340 of 2019 was filed by Seetharama Shetty (the petitioner/plaintiff) seeking recall of the judgment dated 23.08.2019 passed in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Section 114 r/w Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioners seek re-argument on merits, not correction of error.

The review petition was filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) seeking review of an...