Search Results for "Omissions and Contradictions"

957 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 957 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Last Seen Evidence and Incomplete Chain of Circumstances. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Two Key Circumstances—Last Seen Together and Evasive Replies—Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Vinod Kumar, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his neighbour, Dharminder, and sentenced to life imprisonment. The c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Recall of Witnesses for Cross-Examination in Sessions Trial Due to Counsel's Inadvertence and Illness. The court set aside the trial court's rejection of recall applications, holding that the accused should not suffer due to counsel's inadvertence and illness.

The applicant, Namdeo Arjun Rangari, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the orders da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under IPC and POCSO Act — Appellant Argues Contradictions in Evidence and Political Rivalry

The case arose from an incident on 19.11.2014 where a minor girl aged 16 years was allegedly abducted by three accused in a white Omni car. According ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 427, 435, 452 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Sections 302, 427, 435, 452 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellants were...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Adjudicates Appeals Against Conviction in Murder and Arson Case. Evidentiary Value of Dying Declarations and Testimony of Related Witnesses Under Scrutiny for Offences Under Sections 302, 147, 148, 324, 436, 440, 448, 449 r/w 149 IPC.

The matter arose from two criminal appeals filed against the judgment and order of conviction dated 11.4.2011 passed by the Sessions Judge, Parbhani, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Grievous Hurt Case Due to Material Contradictions. Acquittal under Sections 326, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC upheld as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Khalapur, dated 22.07.1996, acquitting the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused Nos. 2-5 in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 r/w Section 149 IPC set aside as evidence of sole eyewitness was full of contradictions, omissions, and improvements, and no independent witness supported the prosecution case.

The case pertains to the murder of Bal Kishan, son of informant Mullo Bai, which occurred on 01.12.2005 at around 4-5 a.m. in Village Hinotiya Gird. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, hears criminal appeal against conviction for murder and cruelty under the Indian Penal Code. The case involves examination of two dying declarations and allegations of dowry demand and harassment leading to death.

The case arises from the death of Kanopatra, a married woman who succumbed to burn injuries on 29 November 2008. Her husband Sunil (accused no.1), his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheating Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Deception. Conviction under Section 417 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that accused made false promise with intent to deceive complainant.

The appellant, Shankar, was convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore, in S.C. No. 78/2005 for the offence punishable ...