Search Results for "Office Memoranda"

94 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 94 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Look Out Circulars Issued by Banks for Loan Recovery — Right to Travel Upheld. Banks Directed to Recall LoCs as Issuance Solely for Civil Debt Recovery Violates Fundamental Rights Under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Dr. Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty, an Indian citizen aged 78 years, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Search Warrant Under Section 105 of Customs Act for Lack of Reasonable Satisfaction. Failure to Record Reasons by Authorized Officer Renders Search Illegal.

The petitioner, Samadhan Steel Traders, challenged a search warrant issued under Section 105 of the Customs Act, 1962, by the Assistant Director, D.S....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Woman Sarpanch. Interpretation of First Proviso to Section 35(3) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 requires both that the Sarpanch be a woman and that the office be reserved for women.

The appellant, Rohini w/o Sanjay Bhosale, filed a Letters Patent Appeal before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) against the order of a learned...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Promote Inspectors in Seniority Dispute Under Central Excise Recruitment Rules. Inter Se Seniority Must Be Fixed Based on 1959 and 1986 Office Memoranda with Quota Rule Compliance, Rejecting High Court's View on Vacancy Register Irrelevance.

The dispute originated from seniority fixation among Inspectors of Central Excise, recruited through direct recruitment and promotion under the Centra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellants in Specific Performance Suit by Reversing High Court Division Bench Judgment. Agreements and Memoranda of Understanding Interpreted Together as Supplementary, with Appellants Found Ready and Willing to Perform Contract Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The dispute arose from four suits filed by the Appellants for specific performance of agreements of sale dated 20.03.1991 and memoranda of understandi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Application of Accused in UAPA Case on Grounds of Parity and Merits. Parity with co-accused granted bail is not a valid ground when the applicant's role is distinct and the first bail application was rejected on merits.

The applicant, Dr. Gokarakonda Naga Saibaba, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail i...