Search Results for "OEM agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "OEM agreement"

11 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Discharges Accused in CBI Case for Alleged Procurement Irregularities in SAFAR Project. Court holds that mere procedural lapses without proof of criminal intent or loss do not constitute offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Indian Penal Code, 1860.

9 Sep 2024

The case arises from a CBI investigation into alleged irregularities in the procurement of Digital Display Systems for the SAFAR project by the Indian...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows BEST and EVEY Appeals in Electric Bus Tender Dispute. Tender Condition Requiring 200 Km Range in Actual Conditions Upheld as Valid and Non-Arbitrary.

5 May 2023

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by BEST and EVEY Trans Pvt. Ltd. and set aside the Bombay High Court's order dated 05.07.2022. The dispute...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Declines to Interfere in Tender Award for Ash Handling Plant; Holds Scope of Judicial Review Limited and Finds No Arbitrariness in Awarding Contract to Lowest Bidder Consortium Despite Office Memorandum Barring Chinese Companies.

2 Nov 2022

The writ petition was filed by Macawber Beekay Pvt. Ltd. challenging the notice inviting tender dated 24.06.2022 and the consequent letter of intent i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Rafale Procurement Case, Corrects Factual Error in Judgment. The Court held that the review petitions did not disclose any error apparent on the face of the record and that the scope of judicial review under Article 32 in procurement matters is limited to examining the decision-making process, pricing, and offsets.

14 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court of India delivered a judgment on a review petition and miscellaneous applications arising from its earlier judgment dated 14.12.2018...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Procurement Dispute — Government Department Cannot Unilaterally Rescind Contract After L1 Bidder Declared. The court held that the existence of an arbitration clause in tender documents is sufficient for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, leaving the issue of contract formation to the arbitrator.

10 Dec 2018

The applicant, Jaina Marketing & Associates, a partnership firm, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting Order Against Contractor in ONGC Contract Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Proposed Penalty. Show Cause Notice Must Clearly Indicate Intended Action of Blacklisting to Afford Meaningful Opportunity of Hearing Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Anchor Offshore Services Ltd (Anchor), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged a blacklisting order dated 5th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Claim for Depreciation on Share Issue Expenses Capitalised to Plant and Machinery. Expenditure on Raising Share Capital Not Part of Actual Cost Under Section 32 of Income Tax Act, 1961, and Falls Under Section 35D as Preliminary Expenses.

12 Mar 2015

The case involves an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the assessment ye...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Modvat/CENVAT Credit Case — Assessee Entitled to Credit on Moulds Supplied by OEM Without Ownership or Lease. The court held that after the 1994 amendment, Rules 57Q and 57R of Central Excise Rules, 1944 do not require ownership or lease of capital goods for availing credit; use in manufacture is sufficient.

16 Feb 2015

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ...

High Court

ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 56 OF 2013

4 Apr 2013

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Pre-Qualification Bids in High Security Registration Plates Tender; No Arbitrariness Found. Rejection of Bids on Grounds of Non-Disclosure of Joint Venture Partner and Non-Submission of OEM Agreement Was Not Arbitrary Under Article 226 as Tender Evaluation Committee’s Decision Was Reasonable.

14 Feb 2006

The High Court of Bombay at Goa considered two writ petitions challenging the rejection of bids at the pre-qualification stage for a tender floated by...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)