Search Results for "Non-compliance with mandatory rules"

100 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 100 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Suit for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. Suit Filed Without Exhausting Mediation Is Not Maintainable and Plaint Liable for Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s Dhanbad Fuels Private Limited against the Union of India and another, setting aside the judgment of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Expulsion of Trading Member for Violating Gross Exposure Limits and Failing to Maintain Capital Adequacy. Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Section 22F - Appeal against Securities Appellate Tribunal order upholding expulsion from National Stock Exchange membership.

The appellant, Rusoday Securities Ltd., was a trading member of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSE) since November 1994 and gave an undert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Legal Metrology Case — Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Failure to Follow Section 29(6) of Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and Rule 23 of Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Rules, 1985 Renders Seizure and Prosecution Invalid.

The applicants, Colgate-Palmolive (India) Ltd. and its Deputy Company Secretary, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Crimina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows ESIC Appeal in ESI Coverage Dispute - Section 2A and Regulation 10B Held Mandatory. Employer's Failure to Obtain Code Number Does Not Excuse Contribution Liability Under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.

The appeal was filed by the Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) under Section 82 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 against the order...