Search Results for "No costs"

19 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Order in W.P.No.2575 of 2022 — No Costs Ordered. The court accepted the parties' submissions that the order had been complied with and closed the contempt proceedings.

The petitioner, Sri Varasiddhi Vinayagar Sath Sangam, filed a contempt petition (CONT P No. 652 of 2024) before the Madras High Court seeking to punis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Order in W.P.No.1268 of 2015 — No Costs Imposed. The court accepted the respondent's submission of compliance, affirmed by the petitioner, and closed the contempt proceedings without further action.

The contempt petition was filed by G. Paulpandian against J. Radhakrishnan, IAS, Commissioner of Greater Chennai Corporation, alleging willful disobed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Order in W.P.No.1268 of 2015 — No Costs Imposed. The court accepted the respondent's submission of compliance, affirmed by the petitioner, and closed the contempt proceedings without punishment.

The contempt petition was filed by G. Paulpandian against J. Radhakrishnan, IAS, Commissioner of Greater Chennai Corporation, alleging willful disobed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition as Withdrawn — Petitioner's Counsel Seeks Withdrawal. No Finding on Merits as Petition Withdrawn Before Hearing.

The petitioner, S. Selvakumar, filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedience of an ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition Against Registrar of Anna University After Compliance with Writ Order. Contempt proceedings under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 closed as respondent complied with order dated 01.08.2025 in W.P.No.28260 of 2025.

The petitioner, E. Venkatraman, filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedience by the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Order in Writ Petition — No Costs Imposed. Contempt proceedings under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, were closed as the respondent complied with the court's order dated 07.08.2025 in W.P.No.5630 of 2025.

The petitioner, G. Murali, filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedience by the respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Withdrawn in Temple Renovation Permission Case — Petitioner Sought Mandamus for Enquiry and Renovation of Arulmighu Karuppannasamy Temple.

The petitioner, Arulmighu Karuppannasamy Temple Trust represented by its Vice President Rajalakshmi Tamilkudimagan, filed a writ petition under Articl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal as Withdrawn in Bank Dispute — No Order as to Costs. Appellant Sought Permission to Withdraw Appeal Against Order in Writ Petition, Which Was Granted.

The appellant, Sekar Iyer, filed a writ appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, challenging an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions in Ceat Ltd. and Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd. Cases Following Lead Case. Petitions Dismissed as Facts and Law Similar to Balkrishna Industries Ltd. v. Union of India.

The Bombay High Court disposed of two writ petitions, WP No.12186 of 2013 filed by Ceat Ltd. and WP No.1799 of 2015 filed by Kalpataru Power Transmiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Market Committee's Writ Petition Quashing Order Dated 17.10.1989. Order Set Aside for Same Reasons as in Connected Matter, No Costs Awarded.

The Bombay High Court disposed of Writ Petition No.2079 of 1990 filed by the Bombay Agricultural Produce Market Committee challenging an order dated 1...