Search Results for "Natham Patta"

15 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Against Encroachment as Natham Patta Already Granted. Court restrains further encroachment beyond assigned extent.

The petitioner, P.Manivasagam, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct respondents 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal Against Writ Order Restoring Possession of Government Land to Encroacher — Holds That Writ Court Cannot Grant Relief Based on Bogus Documents Without Proper Adjudication of Title.

The case involves a writ appeal filed by Prabaharan, Assistant Divisional Engineer, Highways Department, against an order dated 13.09.2018 passed by a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Revenue Authorities to Consider Reclassification of Land from Panchami to Thiyagi Based on Historical Records and Purchase Deed. Court Orders Consideration of Representation Without Expressing Opinion on Merits Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M. Lakshmanan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Patta Rejection for Violation of Natural Justice — Directs Reconsideration After Hearing. Tahsildar's Rejection of Patta Application Without Notice or Hearing Set Aside, Matter Remitted for Fresh Disposal.

The petitioners, R.Essakimuthu, D.Vanaraja, and D.Bharathiraja, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madura...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Title and Possession. Family Arrangement and Adverse Possession Claims Fail as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Possession and Necessary Parties Were Not Impleaded.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the defendant Selvaraj against the concurrent judgments of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court which ...