Case Note & Summary
The petitioner, E. Sundara Murthy, filed a writ petition challenging the proceedings of the District Collector, Tiruvannamalai, dated 10.07.2023, which declined to grant assignment patta in respect of village natham lands in his favour. The petitioner claimed that he was in occupation of grama natham land and had constructed a house, and therefore was entitled to assignment patta. The revenue authorities had treated him as an encroacher and issued notice under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachments Act, 1905, followed by a final notice under Section 6. The petitioner's appeal under Section 10 was dismissed by the District Collector. The impleaded respondent, S. Banu, opposed the petition, stating that the petitioner's encroachment obstructed her ingress and egress to her property. The Additional Government Pleader submitted that the petitioner was not a landless poor person and that grama natham lands are regulated by RSO 21, empowering authorities to evict encroachers. The court examined the submissions and held that the petitioner, being an encroacher and not a landless poor person, was not entitled to assignment patta. The court found no infirmity in the eviction proceedings and dismissed the writ petition, directing the authorities to proceed with eviction in accordance with law.
Headnote
A) Land Law - Grama Natham - Assignment Patta - Tamil Nadu Land Encroachments Act, 1905, Sections 6, 7, 10 - The petitioner challenged the eviction proceedings initiated under the Act, claiming entitlement to assignment patta as he was in occupation of grama natham land. The court held that grama natham lands are regulated by RSO 21 and assignment patta is granted only to landless poor persons. Since the petitioner was not a landless poor person and had encroached upon government land, he was not entitled to patta. The writ petition was dismissed. (Paras 1-7)
B) Land Law - Encroachment - Eviction - Tamil Nadu Land Encroachments Act, 1905, Sections 6, 7 - The revenue authorities issued notice under Section 7 and final notice under Section 6 to the petitioner for encroaching upon grama natham land. The court upheld the eviction action, noting that the authorities are empowered to invoke the Act to evict encroachers from grama natham. (Paras 2, 5, 7)
Issue of Consideration
Whether the petitioner, who is in occupation of grama natham land, is entitled to assignment patta despite being an encroacher and not a landless poor person.
Final Decision
The writ petition is dismissed. The authorities are directed to proceed with the eviction of the petitioner in accordance with law.
Law Points
- Grama natham lands are regulated by RSO 21
- Tamil Nadu Land Encroachments Act
- 1905
- Sections 6
- 7
- 10
- assignment patta only to landless poor persons
- encroacher not entitled to patta
Case Details
WP No. 25498 of 2023 and WMP No. 24888 of 2023
S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender
Mr. D. Murthy for petitioner, Mr. T. Arunkumar (Addl. G.P.) for R1 to R4, Mr. C. Justeen for R5
The District Collector, The Revenue Divisional Officer, The Tahsildar, The Block Development Officer, S. Banu
Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more)
Subscribe Now
Nature of Litigation
Writ petition challenging the order of the District Collector declining to grant assignment patta and upholding eviction proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachments Act.
Remedy Sought
Petitioner sought quashing of the District Collector's order dated 10.07.2023 and grant of assignment patta for grama natham land.
Filing Reason
Petitioner claimed entitlement to assignment patta as he was in occupation of grama natham land, but the revenue authorities treated him as an encroacher and initiated eviction proceedings.
Previous Decisions
The District Collector dismissed the petitioner's appeal under Section 10 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachments Act by order dated 10.07.2023.
Issues
Whether the petitioner is entitled to assignment patta for grama natham land despite being an encroacher?
Whether the eviction proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachments Act are valid?
Submissions/Arguments
Petitioner argued that he is in occupation of grama natham land and has constructed a house, and the Tahsildar's report supports his claim for patta.
Impleaded respondent argued that the petitioner's encroachment obstructs her pathway and that patta was already granted to his daughter-in-law for adjacent land.
Government Pleader argued that the petitioner is not a landless poor person and grama natham lands are regulated by RSO 21, and the authorities are empowered to evict encroachers.
Ratio Decidendi
Grama natham lands are regulated by RSO 21 and assignment patta is granted only to landless poor persons. An encroacher who is not a landless poor person is not entitled to assignment patta, and the revenue authorities are empowered to evict such encroachers under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachments Act, 1905.
Judgment Excerpts
Grama natham are regulated by the revenue authorities in terms of RSO 21 and the authorities are empowered to invoke the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachments Act to evict the encroachers in gram natham.
Thus, there is no infirmity in respect of enforcement action taken.
Procedural History
The revenue authorities issued notice under Section 7 and final notice under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachments Act, 1905, to the petitioner. The petitioner appealed under Section 10, which was dismissed by the District Collector on 10.07.2023. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition on 24.03.2026.
Acts & Sections
- Tamil Nadu Land Encroachments Act, 1905: 6, 7, 10
