Search Results for "Motor Vehicles Act 1988 Section 140"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Motor Vehicles Act 1988 Section 140"

196 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 196 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Reduces Compensation by 50% in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased Driver. Deceased's failure to place warning signs after tyre puncture on highway contributed to accident, leading to apportionment of liability under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

19 Jan 2026

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal heirs of Sunil Samharu Yadav, who died in a road accident on 19.05.2013. The deceased w...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Tribunal's Failure to Consider Evidence — Claimants Entitled to Compensation Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Court held that under Section 163A, the claimant need not prove negligence, and the Tribunal erred in dismissing the claim on the ground that the offending vehicle was not identified.

12 Jan 2026

The present appeal was filed by the original claimants, being the wife, major children, and parents of the deceased Shantilal Kalabhai Garasia, a Poli...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Dog on Road Constitutes 'Act of God' Not Negligence. Claimant's Wife Died After Motorcycle Fell Due to Sudden Appearance of Dog; Tribunal Erred in Holding Claimant as Owner of Borrowed Vehicle Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

11 Feb 2021

The appellant, Shri Vithal, filed a claim petition under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for the death of his wife ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Upholds Consumer Fora Orders for Compensation. Ownership of Vehicle Not Transferred Despite Sale Agreement; Insurer Liable to Pay Claim Amount with Interest.

18 Jun 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Surendra Kumar Bhilawe against The New India Assurance Company Limited, setting aside the National Commi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Subsequent Petition Under Section 22 of Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 Maintainable Despite Dismissal of Earlier Motor Vehicles Act Claim on Ground of Self-Negligence. The Court held that the two Acts operate in different fields and the dismissal of the earlier petition does not bar a claim under the Employee's Compensation Act.

1 Aug 2017

The case involves an appeal filed under Section 30 of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 (formerly Workmen's Compensation Act) by the legal represe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Tribunal Cannot Suo Moto Convert Application Under Section 166 to Section 163(A) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claimants Who Availed Interim Benefit Under Section 140 Are Not Entitled to Final Compensation Under Section 163(A) Without Proper Application.

19 Jun 2017

The appeal was filed by The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. against the order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Akot, in Claim Petition No. 77/2005. ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Interim Compensation Under Section 140 MV Act Cannot Be Kept in Abeyance. Tribunal erred in deferring no-fault liability compensation pending final adjudication of main claim petition.

28 Feb 2017

The appellant, K.L. Vidyashankar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation for injuries sustained...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Seeking Directions to Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals for Compliance with Procedural Rules. Court Holds That Insistence on Personal Appearance of Claimants at Filing Is Not Mandatory Under Rule 254(2) of Maharashtra Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989.

21 Dec 2016

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Anil Prabhakar Tadkalkar, a practicing advocate, raising several issues concerning the disposal of claim ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds Interim Compensation Award in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company Liable to Pay Rs.50,000 Under Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Despite Alleged Breach of Policy Conditions. The court held that Section 140 provides for no-fault liability and the insurer cannot avoid interim compensation on grounds of breach of policy conditions.

20 Aug 2015

The appeal was filed by the Insurance Company, HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd., challenging the order dated 8.7.2014 passed by the Motor Accident...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Insurer of Truck held not liable as accident caused solely by bus driver's negligence, but insurer of bus liable to pay compensation with right to recover from owner.

2 Jul 2010

The National Insurance Company Ltd. (appellant) filed two appeals against the judgment and order dated 18th February 2008 passed by the Motor Accident...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)