Search Results for "Mineral Dispatch Permit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Mineral Dispatch Permit"

6 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Director of Mines and Geology in Royalty Dispute — State Can Charge Higher Royalty Due to Change in Law Despite Tender Agreement. The Court held that a subsequent amendment to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 increasing royalty rates applies to existing contracts unless expressly excluded.

1 Jan 2026

The Director of Mines and Geology, Karnataka, appealed against the High Court of Karnataka's order allowing the writ petition of M/s BMM Ispat Ltd. Th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Director of Mines in CBI Case Alleging Criminal Conspiracy and Abuse of Official Position — Held That No Prima Facie Case Made Out for Framing of Charges Under IPC and PC Act. Reconstitution of Partnership Firm Does Not Require Transfer Permission Under Rule 37 of Mineral Concession Rules, 1960; Bonafide Administrative Decision Protected Under Section 27 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

7 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M.E. Shivalingamurthy, the former Director of Mines and Geology of Karnataka, against the High Court's o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against Requirement of Second Forest Transit Pass for Iron Ore Transport from Railway Sliding to Factory Premises. The court held that such insistence was contrary to law laid down in W.P.No.24072/2005 and W.A.No.726/2008, and Rule 3 of Karnataka (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage of Minerals) Rules, 2011.

11 Jan 2024

The petitioner, M/s Thakur Industries, a partnership firm engaged in mining business, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Deemed Extension of Mining Lease Under Section 8A(3) of MMDR Act — Lease Cancelled and Expired Before Amendment. Interim Order Staying Cancellation Did Not Revive Lease; Petitioner Not Entitled to Deemed 50-Year Period Under Section 8A(3) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 as Amended by Act No.10/2015.

30 Jun 2021

The petitioner, M/s R.K. Industries, a proprietary concern, was granted a mining lease (ML No.1228) for quartz mineral on 22nd February 1975 under the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows JSPL to Transport Iron Ore from SMPL's Lease Area Despite Expired Environmental Clearance. Mining Operations Definition Under Section 3(d) of MMDRA Does Not Include Transportation of Already Mined Minerals, Affirming High Court's Writ of Mandamus.

14 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the State of Odisha against the Orissa High Court's order directing the State to grant transport permi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Defines Aravali Hills and Ranges for Conservation in T.N. Godavarman Case. Court adopts scientific definition based on geological and ecological criteria to prevent desertification and protect biodiversity across Delhi, Haryana, Gujarat, and Rajasthan.

20 Nov 2025

The Supreme Court of India, in its inherent jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution, addressed the critical issue of defining 'Aravali Hills...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)