ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 56 OF 2013
4 Apr 2013...
Search Results for "Mascon Multiservices"
6 result(s) found
Found 6 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Arbitration Petition in Interest on Security Deposit Dispute. Contractual Bar on Interest and Non-Applicability of Section 31(7)(a) Arbitration Act Renders Claim Unsustainable; Arbitrator’s Finding on Evidence Upheld.
11 Aug 2014The dispute arose from an agreement dated 30 December 1996 between the petitioner, M/s. Mascon Multiservices & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., and the responde...
- 37
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Oil Corporation in Kerosene Supply Contract Dispute. Arbitrator Had Rejected Limitation Defense Under Contractual Clause and Held Clause Not Void Under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act.
4 Mar 2015The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the original respondent in the ...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Single Judge Order in Arbitration Dispute Over Dealership Termination – Remands Petition for Merits Consideration After Finding Waiver of Time Limit for Arbitral Award by Conduct. Waiver of Contractual Time Limit Under Arbitration Agreement Upheld Where Party Continues Participation Without Objection; Award Not Automatically Void Despite Expiry of Mandate.
16 Apr 2012The dispute arose from an agreement of dealership for a petrol/diesel distributorship between the appellant, M/s Snehdeep Auto Centre, and the respond...
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Being Beyond Stipulated Time — Arbitration Clause Mandates Award Within Four Months of Entering Reference, Failure Renders Award Void.
2 May 2012The appeal arose from an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside an arbitral award dated 17th August 2006 on the ground...
- 131
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Bridge Construction Dispute — No Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Perverse or Contrary to Public Policy. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contract clauses regarding fixed and variable costs, finding no patent illegality or perversity.
23 Sep 2022The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against a Single Judge's order dismissing a Section 34 pet...
- 49
