Search Results for "Market Fee Exemption"

48 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeals in Service Tax on Airport Development Fee Case. User Development Fee Collected by Airport Operators Under Statutory Authority is Not Subject to Service Tax Under Finance Act, 1994.

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the revenue against CESTAT orders that had held user development fee collected by airport operators not liable...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation in Water Tax Levy Under UP Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Reverses Refund Order. Water and Sewerage Tax Imposed on Premises is Valid as Tax on Lands and Buildings Under Entry 49 of List II, Not a Fee, Under Section 52(1)(a) of the Act.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the first respondent, Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment Corporation, challenging the levy of water ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Company in Agricultural Marketing Act Case — Processed Goods Not Covered. Notification Adding Sugar, Dry Fruits, and Edible Oils to Schedule Under Section 62 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 Held Ultra Vires.

The petitioner, Britannia Industries Limited, a public company with its registered office in Calcutta and a branch in Bombay, filed a writ petition un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Development Charge Levy in Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the levy is a fee for services rendered and not a tax, and the amendment is within legislative competence.

The petitioners, The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and another, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Regiona...