Search Results for "Marathi Translation"

209 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 209 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority mechanically recited grounds without considering detenu's custody status.

The petitioner, Rohit Sidram Khatal, challenged an order of detention dated 17/3/2020 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur under Section 3 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Communication of Representation to Advisory Board. Failure to Forward Detenu's Representation to Advisory Board Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 10 of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Rupesh Ram Thakur, challenged an order of detention dated 17 October 2017 passed under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dang...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Stale Grounds. The court held that the detaining authority failed to consider the detenu's custody and the delay in passing the order vitiated the subjective satisfaction.

The petitioner, Samad Salim Khan, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, under Section 3(2) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Defective Translation of Grounds of Detention. Error in Translating CR Number in Marathi Version Violates Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Sunil Bharat Govari, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Illegible Documents and Lack of Marathi Translation. Preventive Detention Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution When Grounds Not Communicated Effectively.

The petitioner, Rahul Ambadas Jadhav, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Supply of Hindi Translation of Documents to Detenu Not Conversant with English. Failure to Provide Translated Copies of Material Documents Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, Pradeep Panchal, son of the detenu Brahmpal Panchal, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the detention order dated 7 February 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detaining Authority Failed to Independently Consider Grounds, Leading to Mechanical Affirmation of Proposal.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Janardan @ Janyadada Chintaman Bhoir, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Due to Untruthful Translation of Grounds in Preventive Detention Case. Failure to Furnish Correct Marathi Translation Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3 of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, father of the detenu Shanidas Parshuram Mhatre, challenged the detention order dated 8.10.2004 passed by the Commissioner of Police, T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Preventive Detention Order Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981. Challenge Centers on Whether Non-Literal Translation of Right to Representation in Marathi Vitiates Detention Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The matter arose from a criminal writ petition filed by the detenu under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of preventive ...