Search Results for "Managerial functions"

156 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 156 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appropriate Government for ARAI held to be State Government – Petitioner not deemed a ‘workman’ under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Petition dismissed

The petitioner’s supervisory and managerial functions disqualified him from being classified as a ‘workman.’ The nature of duties and responsib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Telecom Company in Industrial Dispute, Holding Regional Business Head Not a 'Workman' Under Industrial Disputes Act. Managerial and Supervisory Duties Exclude Employee from Section 2(s) Definition Despite Absence of Power to Appoint or Dismiss.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s Bharti Airtel Limited against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had held that the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of workman without compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 held illegal, and reinstatement with full back wages upheld.

The petitioner, M/s. Carona Ltd., challenged the judgment and order of the Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 30th September 2016, in Reference (IDA) No. 156...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Transaction Charges. Transaction charges paid to stock exchanges are not fees for technical services under Section 194J of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as stock exchanges perform regulatory and administrative functions.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) regarding the assessment y...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Reinstatement with Back Wages Granted for Illegal Termination. Workman's Dismissal Without Proper Enquiry and Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal.

The appellant, Chandrashekhar Chintaman Vaidya, was employed by the respondent, National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd., as a workman. He was dismis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...