Search Results for "Mamlatdars' Courts Act 1906"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Mamlatdars' Courts Act 1906"

20 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Mamlatdar's Order Granting Right of Way Under Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Existence of Way and Lack of Alternative Access. The Court declined to interfere with the Mamlatdar's order under Section 5 of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906, as the appellants failed to show perversity or jurisdictional error.

12 Feb 2026

The appellants, Dhansukhbhai Jerambhai Prajapati and another, filed a Letters Patent Appeal before the Gujarat High Court challenging the judgment of ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Mamlatdar's Order in Right of Way Dispute Under Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 — Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Compliance with Statutory Procedure. The Court held that the Mamlatdar exceeded his jurisdiction by deciding title and failing to follow the mandatory procedure under Sections 5 and 6 of the Act, rendering the orders void ab initio.

9 Feb 2026

The petitioners, owners of Survey No. 72 and Survey No. 78 in Village Mandal, Taluka Dhanera, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of t...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Mamlatdar's Order in Way Obstruction Case Under Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 — Lack of Proper Identification of Way and Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. The Court held that proceedings under Section 5 of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 require strict compliance with procedural safeguards, including proper identification of the way and opportunity of hearing.

5 Jan 2026

The petitioners, Rabari Punjaben Govabhai and another, filed a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court challenging orders passed by th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Interim Injunction in Right of Way Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Article 227. The court upheld the interim injunction granted by the trial court and confirmed by the appellate court, finding no perversity or jurisdictional error in the concurrent findings.

23 Mar 2018

The petitioners, Vasudev Pandharinath Raikar and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the concurre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Right of Way Dispute Under Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 — Civil Court Jurisdiction Barred for Orders Under Section 5 of the Act. The Court held that the remedy against a Mamlatdar's order granting right of way lies by way of appeal to the Collector under Section 7 of the Act, and the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain a suit challenging such order.

8 Mar 2017

The appellant, original defendant No.1, was granted a right of way over the plaintiff's field by the Mamlatdar under Section 5 of the Mamlatdars' Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Removal of Obstruction Under Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Right of Way Established Through Revenue Records and Prior Orders, No Perversity Found in Mamlatdar's Order Under Section 5 of Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906.

30 Sep 2016

The petitioners, Vishnu Sukhdev Ghanvat and others, filed a writ petition challenging the decisions of the Sub Divisional Officer, Pathardi, in Revisi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Sub-Divisional Officer's Revision Order for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906. Sub-Divisional Officer Not Authorized to Exercise Revisional Powers Under Section 23(2) of the Act.

24 Jul 2014

The petitioner, Bija Maroti Hatwar, filed an application under Section 5 of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906, seeking to restrain respondent no.1 from...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Right of Way Order Under Mamlatdars' Courts Act Due to Bar of Res Judicata and Lack of Jurisdiction. Dismissal of First Application for Default Operates as Final Order Barring Second Application Under Section 5 of Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906.

15 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Jayant Namdeorao Gohad, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders: (1) the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Tenancy Dispute — Sale Certificate Issued Without Jurisdiction Set Aside. The court held that the Agricultural Land Tribunal had no authority to reopen concluded proceedings and issue a sale certificate under Section 32-M of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, as the purchase price had already been fixed and the tenants had deposited their shares.

6 Jul 2005

This second appeal arises from a tenancy dispute concerning agricultural land. The original plaintiff and defendant No.2 were lawful tenants of the su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Mutation Entries in Revenue Records — Revenue Entries Do Not Confer Title, Civil Suit Is Proper Remedy.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging orders passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer ...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)