Search Results for "Maharashtra rules"

8816 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8816 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Government Circular Restricting Land Compensation Under Consent Award. Circular dated 27.02.2020 Held Ultra Vires the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 and Maharashtra Rules, 2014.

The petitioner, Sanjay Mahadeo Japkar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a Government Circular...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds ITAT Decision Deleting Non-Refundable Deposits as Trading Receipts in Cooperative Sugar Factory Case. Supreme Court Precedent in CIT v. Shri Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Clarifies That Such Deposits Are Not Taxable Under Maharashtra Rules.

The matter arose from a reference under the Income Tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Revenue, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Rule 44(1)(i) of Maharashtra Registration Rules, 1961 as Ultra Vires Registration Act, 1908. Circular requiring NOC from Gram Panchayat for registration of sale deeds quashed for lack of statutory authority.

The petitioners, three individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging Rule 44(1)(i) of the Maharashtra ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.

The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Division Bench Hears Challenge to MPSC Procedural Rule on Wait-List in Judicial Service Recruitment. Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008 Rule 6(3)(b) and Article 234 of the Constitution Examined.

The Bombay High Court Division Bench heard a batch of writ petitions filed by candidates who had applied for the post of Civil Judge Junior Division a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Discriminatory Furlough Condition in Maharashtra Prisons Rules as Unconstitutional. Residence-based classification for furlough eligibility violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Chandradev @ Chandu S/o Pareshwar Rai and Satish S/o Ramchandra Ninapure, were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code a...