Search Results for "Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958"

180 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 180 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion. Disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 applies only to candidates for election, not to sitting members, and the no-confidence motion was validly passed.

The Petitioner, Vitthal Rajaram Shitole, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Koregaonmul. He filed a writ petition challenging a no-confidence motion p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Elected Member for Being Voter in Two Village Panchayats. Voters List Held Conclusive Evidence Under Section 16(1)(i) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Suryakant Shivaji Munde, contested and won the election for a reserved seat (Other Backward Class) from Ward No. 4 of Kesapuri Village...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Parity for Grampanchayat Employees with State Government Employees. Grampanchayat Employees Not Entitled to Same Benefits as State Government Employees Under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

The petitioners, Maharashtra Rajya Grampanchayat Karmachari Mahasangh, a registered union of Grampanchayat employees, filed a writ petition seeking di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Commissioner's Order in Gram Sabha Resolution Dispute — Procedural Irregularities in Gram Sabha Proceedings Render Resolution Invalid.

The Petitioner, Gajanan Baburao Sankpal, was the Chairman of the Pani Purvatha Ani Swachhata Samiti (Water Supply and Sanitation Committee) constitute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Sarpanch Reservation Process in Gram Panchayats Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. District-Level Reservation Overrides Tahsildar's Preliminary Decision; No Vested Right for Candidates Based on Earlier Unfinalized Reservation.

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed by two women elected members of Matond Gram Panchayat from the open category, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds State Election Commission's Power to Reschedule Panchayat Elections in Flood-Affected Areas. The Court held that the Election Commission's powers under Article 243-K are wide enough to postpone elections due to natural calamity to ensure free and fair elections.

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the directions issued by the State Election Commissio...