High Court Upholds Rent Control Act, Denying Britannia’s Claim for Market Rent
8 Aug 2024The fixation of standard rent for an upscale apartment in Mumbai, which was rented to Maya Sunil Alagh, the wife of Britannia's former Managing Direct...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Rice Levy Order"
11 result(s) found
Found 11 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partially Upholds Section 10(26AAA) of Income Tax Act, 1961 in Sikkim Tax Exemption Challenge. Gender-Based Proviso Denying Exemption to Sikkimese Women Marrying Non-Sikkimese Struck Down as Unconstitutional.
13 Jan 2023The judgment concerns a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which...
- 502
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Revenue Authorities in Stamp Duty Undervaluation Cases — Revisional Powers Under Section 47A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Upheld. The Court held that the limitation period for suo motu revision by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority is five years from the date of the order, not from the date of registration.
1 Jan 2020The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the Madras High Court concerning the interpretation of Section 47A of...
- 273
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision That Customs Duty Not Part of 'Purchase Price' Under Bombay Sales Tax Act. The term 'Purchase Price' in Rule 41D does not include customs duty, and set-off under Section 75 is only for intra-State purchases.
23 Aug 2016The case involves a Sales Tax Reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 (BST Act) by the First Bench of the Maharashtra Sales Tax T...
- 233
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Kerosene Dealers' Association Challenging Inclusion of VAT in Ceiling Price. State's Power to Fix Maximum Price Including Taxes Upheld Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955.
10 Sep 2015The petitioners, Mumbai Kerosene Dealers' Association and its members, who are wholesale kerosene dealers holding licences under the Maharashtra Keros...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under Act of 2013 for Rural Water Storage Tank — Multiplier of Two Not Applicable. Court holds that Section 26 read with First Schedule of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 does not mandate multiplier of two for rural land acquisition as the land is not in an urban area.
9 Mar 2015The petitioner, Panjabrao Borade, filed a writ petition challenging notifications dated 19.3.2014 and 13.8.2014 issued by the Deputy Secretary to the ...
- 231
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Customs Demand for Bank Guarantee and Bond for Past Imports — Notification 26/2000-Cus Benefit Cannot Be Withheld Retrospectively Without Show Cause Notice. The court held that demanding security for past final assessments without issuing a show cause notice or alleging fraud violates principles of natural justice and Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962.
6 Apr 2010The petitioner, Biharilal Singhal, proprietor of HiTech Corporation, imported Printed Thermal Paper Rolls and filed two Bills of Entry in August 2009....
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Reference in Sales Tax Penalty Case — Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Appeal as Not Maintainable. The order levying penalty for the first time by the appellate Deputy Commissioner under Section 9(2A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 read with Section 36(3)(d) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 is an original order under Section 36, and the appeal against it is a second appeal under Section 55 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.
25 Feb 2010The case involves a reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 (BST Act) by the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal. The applicant, M/s S...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Market Fee Levy on Tobacco Products Under APMC Act — Tobacco Products Held Not Exempt as 'Manufactured Product' Under Section 2(1)(a) of Bombay Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1939. Processing of tobacco into chewing tobacco or gutka does not transform it into a manufactured product; market fee is leviable.
24 Apr 2006The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by companies and their shareholders challenging the levy of market fee on tobacco products under the Bo...
- 74
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes Petition Challenging Rice Levy as Infructuous Due to Change in Government Policy. Government's decision not to coercively recover levy under Maharashtra Rice (Levy on Rice Millers) Order, 1989 renders challenge infructuous.
17 Jun 2005The petitioners, proprietors of Rice Mills in District Raigad, filed a writ petition challenging the compulsory levy on rice under the Maharashtra Ric...
