Search Results for "Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999"

59 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 59 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.

The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Alternate Land for Project Affected Persons Under Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. Court Directs State to Issue Notice Under Section 16(2)(a) and Consider Claim for Alternate Land for Lands Submerged Under Mahind Pond Project.

The petitioners, legal heirs of Maruti Ganu Supnekar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Appointment of Arogya Sevak from OBC and Project Affected Category. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for appointment from OBC and Project Affected Category in accordance with law.

The petitioner, Manisha Namdevrao Chole, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to consider her claim for appointment to t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for MIHAN Project — Upholds Validity of Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court holds that substantial compliance with Section 4(1) and Section 6 is sufficient and challenge after award is barred by delay and laches.

The petitioners, Bhawarlal Shankarlal Sarda and Lasmikant Shankarlal Sarda, filed two writ petitions challenging the land acquisition proceedings init...