Search Results for "Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act"

12 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Amusement Park Duty Dispute — Concessional Rate Under Section 3(5)(a) of Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923 Not Further Reducible by Section 3(2). The court held that a general admission ticket to an amusement park does not qualify as a lump sum payment for a series of entertainments under Section 3(2), so the duty for the fourth and fifth years is 7.5%.

18 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra against the judgment of the Bombay High Court. The dispute concerned the rate ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council Against Levy of Entertainment Duty on Business Exhibitions. Business-to-business trade shows with restricted entry are not 'entertainment' under Section 2(5) of the Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923, and no duty is leviable under Sections 3 and 4(2).

4 Mar 2013

The Petitioner, The Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council, a company incorporated under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956, organizes annual b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Entertainment Tax Demand Against Charity Show Organizer. Show for Blind Held Exempt Under Section 7 of Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923; Recovery Barred by Limitation.

22 Dec 2016

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a common order/action by the State of Maharashtra to recover entertainment duty from the organize...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Order in Cable Operator Entertainment Duty Case — Compounding Provision Misused as Adjudication Mechanism. Section 9A of Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923 cannot be invoked for determining duty and penalty without a proper adjudication under Section 7.

25 Apr 2012

The petitioner, Vimal Balbhim Nangane, was a cable operator in Mumbai Suburban District. The Collector issued a notice on 15 January 2004 alleging tha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

19 Dec 2006

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...

High Court

High Court Upholds Entertainment Duty on APSARA Award Function; Deletes Penalty. Petitioner's challenge to entertainment duty dismissed, penalty reduced due to legal interpretation issues.

20 Jun 2024

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the order dated 28th September 2007, confirming an entertainment duty demand o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by States of Karnataka and Kerala in Lottery Tax Dispute — State Legislatures Have Competence to Tax Lotteries Under Entry 62 List II. Regulatory Entry 40 List I Does Not Bar State Taxation of Lotteries Organised by Other States.

23 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the States of Karnataka and Kerala against judgments of their respective High Courts which had struck down sta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Charge-Sheet Against Video Game Parlour Owner in Gambling Case — Video Games Not Gambling Without Wagering. Licence Under Bombay Entertainments Act Does Not Authorize Gambling, and Mere Running of Video Games Without Proof of Betting Does Not Attract Section 12(a) of Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887.

29 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Kailash Shreekisan Chaurasia, owned and operated a video game parlour named 'Dream World Video Game Parlour' in Warud, District Amrava...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Members' Club Against Entertainment Duty Demand on Billiards Tables. Principle of Mutuality and Absence of Admission Fee Render Levy Under Section 3 of Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act, 1963 Inapplicable.

11 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Gondwana Club, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, challenged the proceedings initiated by the Entertainment Ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd. Challenging Property Tax Levy by Gram Panchayat. Held that property tax is leviable on industrial land within Gram Panchayat limits under Section 124 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958, and the revision application under Section 124(6) was not maintainable.

31 Jan 2011

The petitioner, M/s. Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd., a company manufacturing automobiles, challenged the property tax demands issued by the Gram Panchayat...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)