Search Results for "Maharashtra Energy Development Agency"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Energy Development Agency"

78 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.

15 Jun 2026

The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...

High Court

High Court Quashes FIR Against Bank Officials and BGR Energy Executives in Bank Guarantee Dispute -- No Criminal Intent Found in Commercial Transaction Under IPC Sections 420, 403, 406, 418, 425, 427 read with 34

23 Feb 2026

The High Court quashed an FIR registered against bank officials and company executives alleging criminal offences in connection with bank guarantee tr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

1 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Preservation of Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai — Directs Restoration of Earmarked Land and Cancellation of Allotment to Private Developer. Land reserved since 2003 under Government Resolution dated 26 March 2003 for a Government Sports Complex cannot be diverted for commercial purposes; shifting the complex to a remote rural area 115 km away is arbitrary.

1 Jul 2024

The Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of CID...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Renew Wind Energy (Rajkot) Pvt Ltd. Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) Scheme does not override State Commission's power to determine tariff for wind energy under Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

13 Apr 2023

The case involves appeals under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003, by Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited and other distribution licensees against...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Corporate Insolvency Case Involving Land Ownership and Development Rights Dispute. Court Upholds NCLAT Order Protecting Licensee's Possession of 10000 Sq.Ft. While Preserving Corporate Debtor's Development Rights as Intangible Assets Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

14 Mar 2023

The appeals arose from a common order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal dismissing two independent appeals filed against an order of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by DISCOMs and Generating Companies in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Change in Law Compensation for Coal Shortfall Must Be Computed Based on Actual GCV and SHR as per PPAs.

3 Mar 2023

The judgment involves two civil appeals concerning the determination of compensatory tariff for Change in Law events under long-term Power Purchase Ag...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Captive Power Producers in Hydel Policy Dispute Over Water Royalty Charges. The court held that the agreements incorporating the government policy did not impose water royalty liability on captive power producers, distinguishing them from independent power producers under the policy framework.

6 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by M/s. Indsil Hydro Power and Manganese Limited (INDSIL) and Carborundum Universal Limited (CUMI) against a comm...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 2329 OF 2003

21 Dec 2018

The petitioners, K.P. Power Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition in 2003 before the Bombay High Court seeking a mandamus to compel ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Appeals Concerning Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, Addressing Safety and Regulatory Measures Under Atomic Energy Act, 1962. The Court Deliberates on Balancing National Energy Policy with Public Apprehensions Stemming from Past Nuclear Incidents.

1 Jan 1970

The case centers on appeals related to the establishment of a nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu. The judgment begins by acknowledging th...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)