Search Results for "MSETCL Regulations"

17 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Transfer Order of Chief Engineer in MSETCL for Non-Compliance with Transfer Policy. Transfer of Employee Mid-Academic Year Without Considering Family Circumstances Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Departmental Transfer Guidelines.

The petitioner, Sanjay Tulshiram Shinde, a Chief Engineer with Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd. (MSETCL), challenged an office orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examined Maintainability of Writ Petition Challenging Selection Process for Technician Posts — Estoppel and Delay Considered. Selection Process for Project Affected Persons Under Scrutiny for Award of Additional Marks to MSEB Company’s Own Project Affected Persons.

The petitioner, a project affected person (PAP), applied for the post of Technician Class-6 in response to an advertisement issued on 4 December 2017 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Transmission Licence Without TBCB in HVDC Project. Section 63 of Electricity Act, 2003 is an alternative route; regulatory commission has discretion to adopt regulated tariff mechanism for transmission projects.

The case involves a challenge by Tata Power Company Limited Transmission (TPC-T) against the grant of a transmission licence by the Maharashtra Electr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petitions Challenging CGRF Orders on Recovery of Additional Charges from Consumers. MERC Orders on FAC and AEC Recovery Upheld as Binding on Distribution Licensee.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a group of writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in MSETCL — Probation Period Extended Validly Under Service Rules. Termination of Probationer Without Stigma Upheld as Employer's Discretion Under Regulation 11 of MSETCL Service Regulations.

The petitioners, Chandrashekhar Tukarampant Madankar, Anup Udhav Lokhande, and Harshal Radheshyam Malewar, were appointed as Junior Engineers (Electri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax TDS Case — Wheeling and Transmission Charges Not Rent Under Section 194I. Payments for Use of Transmission Lines Held Not Rent as No Transfer of Possession or Right to Use Occurs.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which held that whee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in MSETCL — Termination During Probation Valid Without Stigma or Mala Fides. Probationer has no right to the post and termination simpliciter during probation does not attract principles of natural justice.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by probationary employees of the Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd (MSETCL) chal...