Search Results for "MRTU and PULP Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "MRTU and PULP Act"

516 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 516 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Jurisdiction in Transfer Dispute Under MRTU & PULP Act — Issuance of Transfer Order at Mumbai Confers Jurisdiction. Transfer order issued at Mumbai to employee posted in Rajasthan held to confer jurisdiction on Industrial Court at Mumbai under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

19 Sep 2025

The petition was filed by Raptakos Brett & Co. Ltd., a pharmaceutical company, challenging an order of the Industrial Court at Mumbai dated 4 May 2022...

High Court

Examining the scope of Industrial Court’s jurisdiction in unfair labor practice complaints under MRTU & PULP Act in the context of employer-employee relationships.

22 Oct 2024

Acts and Sections Discussed: Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices (MRTU & PULP) Act, 1971 - Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Senior Sales Executive Challenging Termination — Holds He Is Not an 'Employee' Under MRTU & PULP Act. The court affirmed that the petitioner's supervisory and managerial role excluded him from the definition of employee under Section 3(5) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

26 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Mr. Jobi Joseph, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 1 April 2014 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Rejection of Recognition Application Under MRTU and PULP Act. Industrial Court's finding that the Petitioner-Union failed to establish membership among employees of the successor company PMPML upheld.

22 Mar 2024

The Petitioner, Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Karmachari Mahasangh, a trade union, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Retrenchment of School Employee Falls Under MRTU & PULP Act, Industrial Court Has Jurisdiction. The court held that termination without following Section 5 of MEPS Act constitutes retrenchment under Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, exclusively triable by Industrial Court.

13 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Neena B. Rangnekar, was employed as a Junior Clerk with respondent no.1 Trust from 1 February 1989 and later promoted to Senior Clerk....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Revision Petition Under MRTU & PULP Act — Industrial Court Has Power to Permit Amendment. The Court held that the Industrial Court exercising revisional jurisdiction under Section 44 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 has the power to permit amendment of the memo of revision petition, as the power to allow amendment is inherent in the exercise of revisional jurisdiction.

5 May 2022

The petitioners, Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Technical and Educational Society and another, challenged an order dated 16/09/2019 passed by the Industr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Bank Employees Challenging Termination — Upholds Industrial Court's Order for Reinstatement Without Back Wages. Termination for Unauthorised Absence Held Disproportionate; Reinstatement Granted But Back Wages Denied Due to Lack of Pleading and Proof of Willingness to Work.

27 Jun 2014

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals filed by employees of Vyapari Sahakari Bank Maryadit, Solapur, challenging their termination from service...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition in Bonus Dispute Under Amended Section 12 of Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that denial of bonus based on Rs.3,500 salary limit constitutes an unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

18 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Babasaheb Kedar Shetkari Sahakari Sut Girni, a cooperative spinning mill, challenged the judgment and order of the Industrial Court, N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Forest Department's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Back Wages to Daily Wagers. Daily wage employees deemed entitled to reinstatement and back wages from date of termination due to non-compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

9 Mar 2012

The petitioners, the Chief Conservator of Forests and other forest department officials, challenged the judgment and order dated 13-7-2005 passed by t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order for Full Back Wages and Retrenchment Compensation to Workmen in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Company's Claim of Financial Difficulty and Closure Not Sufficient to Deny Workmen's Entitlement Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

31 Mar 2006

The petitioner, D.G.P.Windsor (India) Ltd., challenged an order dated 22nd September 2005 passed by the Industrial Court, Thane in Complaint (ULP) No....

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)