Search Results for "MCX"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "MCX"

24 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 24 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Multi Commodity Exchange in Recovery Suit — Limitation Runs from Declaration of Defaulter Under Exchange Rules. Suit for recovery of membership dues filed within three years of declaring member as defaulter on 8 March 2018 is within limitation, reversing trial court's dismissal.

13 Mar 2025

The appellant, Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd. (MCX), filed a Commercial First Appeal against the judgment dated 8 March 2022 of the City Civil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Jurisdictional Clash Between Forward Markets Commission and Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Over Electricity Futures Trading. The Court Considered Whether the Electricity Act, 2003 Overrides the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952, and Whether the Power Market Regulations 2010 Framed by CERC Were Ultra Vires.

7 Feb 2011

The matter involved two writ petitions being heard together by the Bombay High Court, arising from a jurisdictional conflict between two regulatory bo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decides Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Specific Performance Suit Involving Share Buyback Under Letter of Undertaking. The appeal challenges the grant of interim injunction on grounds that the agreement is not a concluded contract and that its performance would breach MIMPS Regulations making it void under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

11 Sep 2015

The appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court arises from an order dated 13 October 2014 passed by a single judge granting interim inj...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Section 9 Petition in Part Recognizing IGRC Order as Conciliation Settlement Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court ruled that the IGRC order, with mutual acknowledgment, constitutes a settlement agreement under Sections 73 and 74 of the Act, and the petitioner must pursue civil remedies against respondents not party to the exchange bye-laws' dispute resolution mechanism.

19 Mar 2021

The dispute arose from commodity futures trading where Titan Co. Ltd., a company dealing in watches and jewellery, engaged Karvy Comtrade Ltd., a comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Section 34 Petitions Challenging Conflicting Stock Exchange Arbitral Awards. Court Focuses on Whether Same Arbitrator's Contradictory Findings on Identical Facts Vitiated Awards Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Sep 2025

Three petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 were heard together by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rejection of Plaint Against Directors in Commercial Suit -- No Cause of Action Against Nominee Director and Other Directors -- Corporate Personality Principle Upheld

5 Feb 2026

The Bombay High Court allowed Notices of Motion filed by Defendant Nos. 3 to 8 seeking rejection of the Plaint -- The Plaintiff had sued Defendants an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears SEBI's Application to Recall Sanction of Composite Scheme in Fertilizers Merger Case. Securities Regulator Alleges Material Non-Disclosure and Accounting Violations in Scheme Involving Listed and Unlisted Companies Under Companies Act, 1956.

10 Sep 2015

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) filed applications on 21.02.2013 seeking recall of orders of the Bombay High Court dated 17.06.2011 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act — Upholds Broker's Right to Square Off Client Positions Without T+1 Notice Under Member Client Agreement. The court held that the arbitral award was not perverse or contrary to public policy as the broker acted in accordance with the contract terms.

26 Apr 2016

The appeal was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Bonanza Commodities Brokers Pvt. Ltd. (the appellant/broker) a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Tribunal's Finding That Broker Failed to Prove Client's Liability. Member Client Agreement and Running Account Basis Did Not Shift Burden of Proof to Client Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Bonanza Commodities Brokers Pvt. Ltd., a member of Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd. (MCX), filed a petition under Section 34 of ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Failure to Object to Contract Notes Renders Oral Claims Unsupported. The Court held that a client who receives and does not object to timely contract notes for commodity derivatives transactions cannot later claim those transactions were unauthorized, and an arbitral award based solely on oral submissions ignoring such documentary evidence is liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 Dec 2014

The Petitioner, M/s. Nirmal Bang Commodities Pvt. Ltd., a broker registered under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged an arbitral award dated 27 Febru...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)