Madras High Court Hears Writ Petition Seeking Migration of BDS Student Due to Rheumatic Pain. Petitioner Alleged Difficulty in Pursuing Studies at Current Institute and Sought Transfer to Institute in Puducherry.
19 Mar 2025...
Search Results for "MAHE"
19 result(s) found
Found 19 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment on Appeal Against Order of Civil Imprisonment and Compensation Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC in Trade Mark Infringement Suit. The Court Considers Whether the Ex Parte Injunction Survived Transfer of Suit and Whether Use of 'MAHE' and 'Manipal Groups' Constituted Willful Disobedience.
17 Jul 2023The appeal arose from an order dated 28.09.2022 passed by the Commercial Court, Bengaluru Rural District, in Commercial Misc. No.246/2021, holding the...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows University Appeal in Increment Dispute Under UGC Scheme. Two Advance Increments Denied to Lecturer Holding Ph.D. on Placement as Selection Grade Lecturer Upheld.
10 May 2023The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which directed the Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit to grant two advance i...
- 150
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Shifting of Liquor Shop Between Regions in Union Territory of Puducherry. The term 'place' in Rule 209 of the Puducherry Excise Rules, 1970 is not restricted to a particular region but permits shifting within the entire Union Territory.
18 Dec 2019The appellant, M/s Cee Cee & Cee Cee's, held an F.L. 1 License under the Puducherry Excise Act, 1970 for wholesale vending of Indian Made Foreign Liqu...
- 178
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Partition Appeal in Co-owner Dispute — Rejects Adverse Possession Claim. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner without ouster, and a suit for partition is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
21 Oct 2019The case involves a family dispute over property originally owned by M.A. Mohammed Ayoob. The appellant, Mohammed Hussain, filed a suit for partition ...
- 68
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Infancy Benefit Under Section 16(1)(b) of EPF Act — Hospital Established After Closure of Previous Unit Held Entitled to Infancy Exemption. The court held that the closure of the old hospital in 1989 and the subsequent establishment of a new hospital under a different trust with a new management structure constituted a new establishment under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
27 Apr 2017The petitioner, Manipal Goa Cancer & General Hospital, challenged two orders: (a) an order dated 18/06/2007 by the Assistant Provident Fund Commission...
- 73
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Repayment of Loans in Cash Not Violative of Section 269T Where Loans Were Not Taken by Assessee. The court held that Section 269T applies only to repayment of loans taken by the assessee, not to repayment of advances received from others.
18 Aug 2015The Revenue appealed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore, which had set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271E of ...
- 78
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in TDS Dispute — Payment to Non-Resident for Software Not Royalty Under Section 9(1)(vi) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Payment for shrink-wrapped software held to be for copyright article, not transfer of copyright rights, thus not taxable as royalty.
9 Mar 2015The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)) against the common order o...
- 43
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in TDS Dispute — Payment to Non-Resident for Software Not Royalty. Payment for purchase of shrink-wrapped software from non-resident held not royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) of Income Tax Act, 1961, as no copyright transferred.
9 Mar 2015The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appella...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC — Suit for Declaration and Injunction Not Barred by Cooperative Court Jurisdiction. The court held that the dispute regarding sale of property by a cooperative society to third parties does not fall within the ambit of 'business of the society' under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and thus the civil suit is maintainable.
23 Feb 2015The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the applicants (original defendant nos. 1 and 2) against an order dated 17th July 2013 passed ...
- 80
