Search Results for "Lapse of proceedings"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Lapse of proceedings"

18 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. The Court held that acquisition proceedings did not lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, as possession was taken, and the writ petitioner lacked locus standi due to unproven title.

20 Jan 2023

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Delhi, which allowed a writ petition and declared that land acquisition proceedings under the La...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 When Possession Could Not Be Taken Due to Court Stay, and Stay Period Must Be Excluded from Five-Year Computation.

20 Jan 2023

The dispute originated from land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The respondent landowner filed a writ petitio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Interim Application in Land Acquisition Case Under Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Acquisition proceedings for Peripheral Ring Road lapsed as compensation was not paid nor possession taken before commencement of the 2013 Act under Section 24(2), rendering interim relief infructuous.

20 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings for the Peripheral Ring Road (PRR) around Bangalore, initiated by the Bangalore Development Author...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Quash Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Due to Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Lapsed as Possession Not Taken and Compensation Not Paid Despite Award Made in 2008.

2 May 2019

The petitioners, Reliance Natural Resources Limited and its director Murli Manohar Purohit, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitutio...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitions Declaring Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Acquisition for Karwar Port Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Taking of Possession.

11 Apr 2019

The petitioners, fishermen residing in Goudawada, Baitkhol, Karwar, Uttara Kannada, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Petition Declaring Land Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Award Made After Commencement of 2013 Act Without Taking Possession or Paying Compensation Results in Lapse of Proceeding.

10 Apr 2019

The petitioners, owners of land Gat No. 176 in Khelbar, Jalgaon Jamod, challenged the land acquisition proceeding initiated under Section 6 notificati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Notice Issued to Deceased Person Invalid. The court held that a notice under Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 issued to a person who had died before the notice is invalid, and since possession was not taken and compensation not paid, the acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

8 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Vithoba Ravaji Jadhav (since deceased through legal heir Subhash Vithoba Jadhav), owned land Gat No.422/2 at Vadgaon Bhande, Tal. Daun...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Lapse Claim by Muley Family Members — Acquisition Proceedings Initiated in 1968 Deemed Lapsed Due to Non-Completion and Non-Payment of Compensation. Land Acquisition Officer directed to pass appropriate orders under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as the award was not made within two years of the declaration under Section 6.

18 Apr 2015

The petitioners, members of the Muley family, filed two writ petitions challenging the acquisition of their land, plot No.33/1, Sheet No.40A, Ward No....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Compensation in Land Acquisition Case Due to Unauthorized Possession and Lapsed Proceedings. Possession taken in 2001 without acquisition; court directs compensation under 2013 Act with interest from date of possession.

26 Mar 2015

The petitioners, four agriculturists from village Koradgaon Hilalpur, owned agricultural land admeasuring 1 hectare 73 ares (4 acres 13 ares) out of G...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Under MHADA Act Due to Non-Compliance with Section 41(1) Proviso and Lapse of Urban Land Ceiling Proceedings. Acquisition Notification Held Invalid as Land Already Vested in State Under Urban Land Ceiling Act Was Not Available for Acquisition Under MHADA Act.

31 Jan 2012

The case involves a challenge to the acquisition of land bearing Survey No. 113/3 and 115/6 at Solapur under the Maharashtra Housing and Area Developm...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)