Search Results for "Land Ceiling"

349 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 349 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes BPCL Circular Imposing Refill Ceiling Limits on LPG Distributors as Unilateral and Arbitrary. Distributorship Agreements Without Ceiling Limits Cannot Be Varied Unilaterally by Issuing Circulars.

The petitioners, seven LPG distributors of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), challenged a circular dated 4 January 2018 and a subsequent co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging NPPA's Interpretation of DPCO 2013 — Price Ceiling Applicable Only to Formulations in First Schedule. The court held that NPPA cannot impose price ceiling on non-scheduled formulations under DPCO 2013, as the order's language is clear and unambiguous.

The petitioners, M/s. Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. and the Indian Drug Manufacturers Association (IDMA), challenged the interpretation and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Ceiling Act Case — Gift Deed Valid Despite Lack of Express Acceptance. Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Sections 122 and 123 do not require express acceptance; implied acceptance from circumstances suffices for a valid gift between father and son.

The present appeal arises from a land ceiling dispute in Rajasthan. Daulat Singh (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) was the owner of 254.2 B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Upholds Vesting of Land in State and Rejects Ownership Claim. The Court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove their title and that the suit was barred by res judicata and limitation.

The case involves a dispute over land bearing No.73, Canal Circular Road, Calcutta, which was part of a larger parcel of land. The plaintiffs, claimin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Dispute Involving Surplus Land and Tenancy Rights. Court upholds Single Judge's order confirming that land was not surplus and appellants were not entitled to restoration of possession under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code and Bombay Tenancy Act.

The case involves three Letters Patent Appeals arising out of writ petitions decided by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur. The appella...