Search Results for "LPG distributorship"

20 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes BPCL Circular Imposing Refill Ceiling Limits on LPG Distributors as Unilateral and Arbitrary. Distributorship Agreements Without Ceiling Limits Cannot Be Varied Unilaterally by Issuing Circulars.

The petitioners, seven LPG distributors of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), challenged a circular dated 4 January 2018 and a subsequent co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in LPG Distributorship Termination Dispute. Clause 29 of Distributorship Agreement Allowed Termination Without Assigning Reasons, and Arbitrator's Findings Were Not Perverse or Contrary to Public Policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Prasad Gas Agency, was appointed as a distributor of LPG (Bharat Gas) by the respondent, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to LPG Distributor Selection Guidelines and Advertisement. Guidelines Providing for Objective Criteria Including Land Ownership and Financial Capacity Upheld as Valid.

The petitioners, Suresh Pralhad Pawar and Balasaheb Mahadeo Kshirsagar, filed writ petitions challenging the advertisement dated 27th July 2011 issued...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging LPG Distributorship Selection by Draw of Lots. Court holds that mere eligibility does not confer right to distributorship and draw of lots is a valid selection method.

The petitioner, Pushpa Vishal Ghuge, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challenging the selection of respondent No.2, Ja...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of LPG Distributorship for Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice Not Served, Termination Order Set Aside Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Prashant S/o Gulabrao Kamble, was a LPG distributor of Indian Oil Corporation Limited. His distributorship was terminated by the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Removal from LPG Distributorship Panel - Site Location Dispute Resolved in Favor of Petitioner. The court held that the term 'Mouda' in the advertisement includes the Gram Panchayat area, and removal without hearing violates natural justice.

The petitioner, Mukesh Tiwari, applied for an LPG distributorship in Mouda pursuant to an advertisement by Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) and o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Arbitral Award in LPG Distributorship Dispute. The court held that the District Judge's refusal to set aside the award under Section 34 was not perverse and that the award was not in conflict with public policy.

The appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by M/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited challenging the judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Rival LPG Distributor's Writ Petition on Grounds of Delay and Laches. "Delay defeats equity: Court emphasizes that inordinate delay bars relief in discretionary writ jurisdiction."

The Supreme Court dealt with the issue of delay and laches in filing a writ petition challenging the grant of LPG distributorship. The appellant had b...