Search Results for "LPG Order 2000"

30 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes BBMP Closure Order Against LPG Dispensing Station for Violation of Natural Justice. License Cancelled Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing, Violating Principles of Audi Alteram Partem Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Sipani Energy Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, engaged in the business of manufacturing, stocking, and distribution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR and Charge Sheet in LPG Refilling Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Essential Commodities Act. Essential Commodities Act, 1955 Requires Prior Sanction for Prosecution Under Section 7 for Violation of LPG Order, 2000.

The petitioner, C. Ramalingaiah, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) before the High Court o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against BPCL Officials—Lack of Offence Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and LPG Distribution Order, 2000

Absence of Statutory Violation—No Offence Attracted Under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955—Unauthorized Raid by Vigilance Squad Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Delay in Challenging Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Order. Challenge to 2007 ITAT order filed in 2012 dismissed as grossly delayed without sufficient explanation.

The petitioner, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court on 1 October 2012 challenging an order of the Inc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in LPG Distributorship Termination Dispute. Clause 29 of Distributorship Agreement Allowed Termination Without Assigning Reasons, and Arbitrator's Findings Were Not Perverse or Contrary to Public Policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Prasad Gas Agency, was appointed as a distributor of LPG (Bharat Gas) by the respondent, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — Price Revision Upheld as Valid Modification. Letter dated 28 June 1999 held to have modified the terms of the Purchase Order, allowing recoveries and adjustments per letter dated 31 October 2000.

The petitioner, M/s. JCL International Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., on 1 May 1999 for the sup...