COMM ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 543 OF 2025
29 Jul 2026The background of the case involves the acquisition of land admeasuring 1113.2 sq. mtrs. belonging to the predecessor of Respondents 1 and 2 by the Pe...
Search Results for "LARR Act, 2013"
10 result(s) found
Found 10 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Summary Judgment in Recovery Suit Against DDA for Refund of Sale Consideration After Land Acquisition Lapses. The Court held that DDA cannot retain the money after failing to convey title due to lapsing of acquisition, and the suit was within limitation.
29 Apr 2026The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the Delhi High Court's order dismissing the appellant's application for summary judgment under Order XIII...
- 265
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging LARR Authority Orders Allowing Condonation of Delay and Amendment in Land Acquisition Reference. Procedural Flexibility Upheld Under Section 64 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 to Ensure Substantive Justice.
24 Apr 2026The petitioner, Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited, owned approximately 10 acres of land in Village Vikhroli, Mumbai, which was acquired by ...
- 202
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Challenge to Acquisition for Industrial Development — Petitioners Failed to Prove Lapse Under Section 24(2) of LARR Act, 2013. Compensation Tendered and Possession Taken by MIDC, Acquisition Did Not Lapse.
23 Dec 2022The petitioners, Ramesh Bapurao Nikhade and Dilipkumar Bapurao Nikhade, along with the legal representatives of Bapurao Dasruji Nikhade, filed writ pe...
- 21
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Multiple Writ Petitions on Land Acquisition Lapse. Petitioners contend that acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Sections 24, 25 of the 2013 Act due to non-making of award within prescribed period.
6 Sep 2022These writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition proceedings. The petitioners, who...
High Court
Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Land Acquisition Under BDA Act; Scheme for BTM Layout Allegedly Lapsed. Petitioners Sought Declaration That Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 27 of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Due to Failure to Substantially Implement Scheme.
19 Jul 2022The writ petition was filed before the Karnataka High Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by land owners whose property was ...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Declaring Income Tax Exemption Under Section 96 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Applicable to Land Acquisitions Under KIAD Act, 1966. Compensation for Land Acquisition Under State Act Entitled to Same Tax Exemption as Under Central Act.
21 Apr 2022The petitioners, M/s Sri Balaji Corporate Services and NCC Urban Infrastructure Limited, along with individual landowners, challenged the denial of in...
- 111
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses BDA Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Single Judge Order Quashing Acquisition for Lapse of Time and Non-Compliance with Section 11A of LARR Act. The court held that failure to pass award within two years from Section 6 declaration renders acquisition void, and alternative remedy under Section 18 is not a bar when acquisition is invalid.
3 Jan 2020The case involves two writ appeals filed by the Bengaluru Development Authority (BDA) against a common order of a learned Single Judge dated 16.06.201...
- 138
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Pimpri-Chinchwad New Town Development Authority — Compensation Enhancement Granted. Landowners entitled to higher compensation under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for acquisitions under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
7 Aug 2019The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by landowners and a developer challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Pimpri-Chinch...
- 249
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Land Acquisition Notifications under Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 on Grounds of Non-Compliance with LARR Act, 2013. Petitioners Alleged That Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Taking of Possession Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, and That Procedural Irregularities Vitiated the Notifications.
20 Dec 2017The petitioners, owners of agricultural land in Jalna, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation ...
- 12
