Search Results for "Karnataka Stamp Act"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order on Stamp Duty in Specific Performance Suit. Agreement for Sale Recognized Prior Possession, Thus Stamp Duty Payable Under Article 5(e)(ii) of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, Not as Conveyance Under Article 5(e)(i).

The dispute originated from a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 23.06.2018 filed by respondent No.1 against the petitioner and other...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Flat Buyers, Upholds Commission's Order Exonerating Landowners from Joint Liability with Developer for Deficiency in Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by flat buyers seeking to hold landowners jointly and severally liable with the developer for delay in handing ove...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Unregistered Relinquishment Deed Invalid: Daughter’s Coparcenary Rights Upheld | Karnataka HC (RFA No.100096/2019, 2026)

The plaintiff filed a suit for partition and separate possession of her 1/5th share in ‘A’ and ‘B’ schedule properties, along ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Order in Property Dispute Under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, Remands for Fresh Consideration Based on Prior Possession Claim

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, challenging an order dated 25.11.2019 that directed them t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court on Compliance and Contempt: Implementing Judicial Directives with Precision. Ensuring Rule of Law Through Accountability in Compliance of Judicial Orders.

The Supreme Court adjudicated a series of contempt petitions alleging deliberate non-compliance with its orders dated 21.11.2014, 17.05.2022, and 19.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rules on Stamp Duty Penalty: A Critical Examination of Section 34 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Seetharama Shetty vs. Monappa Shetty, addressed the legal implications of Sections 33, 34, 37, and 39 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Inherent Powers of Courts to Recall Insufficiently Stamped Evidence. Key Judgment on the Reassessment of Admitted Documents in Civil Proceedings to Prevent Revenue Loss

This civil appeal addresses whether a court can recall the admission of an instrument as evidence, which was marked as an exhibit despite being insuff...