Search Results for "Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules"

129 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 129 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals By Appellants. Against State Of Gujarat Ors. -- Holds Construction Equipment Not Motor Vehicles Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 -- Exempts From Registration And Tax Under Gujarat Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958

The Supreme Court examined whether various construction equipment used by cement manufacturers within their factory premises constitute 'motor vehicle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Holds Insurer Liable for Autorickshaw Accident Despite Driver Lacking Transport Endorsement. Driving Licence for Light Motor Vehicle Covers Autorickshaw as Public Transport Vehicle Under Section 2(21) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves an appeal by the National Insurance Company Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 24.10.2009 passed by the MACT, Mangaluru in MV...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Transport Authority in Motor Vehicles Act Case on Vehicle Replacement Rule. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rule 174(2)(c) Validated as It Does Not Exceed Section 83 and Serves Public Safety by Prohibiting Older Vehicle Replacements.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute concerning the validity of Rule 174(2)(c) of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, which allows the tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Temporary Authorisation and NOC for Vehicles with Cancelled Fitness Certificates. Authorities Directed to Accept Tax Dues and Issue No Objection Certificate Under Section 48 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Geekom Logistech Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in transport business, owned a fleet of vehicl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Environment Tax Demand on Unfit Vehicle. Vehicle Owner Not Liable to Pay Environment Tax on a Vehicle That Is Mechanically Unfit and Permanently Unusable, as Tax Is Levied on Use of Vehicle on State Roads.

The petitioner, Ashokkumar Shankarprasad, owned a Premier Padmini car (registration No. MZV5876) which was 33 years old and mechanically unfit for use...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Sales Tax Case on Handling Charges. Handling charges for registration of motor cycles are not part of sale price under Section 2(25) of MVAT Act, 2002.

The Revenue appealed against an order of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal which set aside tax on handling charges collected by the respondent, a dea...