Search Results for "Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act"

62 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 62 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 227 Not to Be Used to Reappreciate Evidence. The Court Held That Concurrent Findings of Fact by Trial Court and Appellate Court Cannot Be Interfered With Unless Perverse or Jurisdictional Error Exists.

25 Sep 2025

The petitioners, who were the plaintiffs in a suit for permanent injunction, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fee Upon Withdrawal of Suit Under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Court Fee Deposited at Time of Filing. The court held that the proviso to Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC mandates refund of court fee when a suit is withdrawn unconditionally, and the trial court's rejection of the refund application was erroneous.

19 Aug 2025

The petitioner, Bindu Balakrishna Patali, filed a suit (Com. O.S. 150/2024) before the LXXXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Commercial Cou...

High Court

High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 13. The Debt Recovery Tribunal has inherent power to order refund of court fees under Section 13 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 when the main petition is disposed of as infructuous.

19 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 Applicable. The court held that the DRT erred in rejecting the refund application without considering Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, which provides for refund when a case becomes infructuous.

19 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Trademark Infringement Suit — Sets Aside Trial Court Order Granting Leave to File Additional Written Statement. The court held that inherent powers under Section 151 CPC cannot be used to bypass specific procedural provisions, and allowing additional written statement after framing of issues would cause prejudice to the plaintiff.

7 Jun 2024

The petitioner, M/s BTV Kannada Private Limited, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 CPC read with Article 215 of the Constitution of In...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Against Trial Court's Order on Court Fee in Partition Suit — Section 35(1) of Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958. The court held that the trial court must first determine the market value of the suit properties before directing the plaintiff to pay proper court fee.

24 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Anjanappa, filed a suit for partition (O.S.No.808/2008) before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli, seeking 1/3rd share i...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court's Order on Court Fee Valuation in Partition Suit — Suit Properly Valued Under Section 35(2) of Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958.

20 Feb 2018

The petitioners, defendant Nos. 3 and 4 in a partition suit (O.S. No. 53/2010) pending before the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Udupi, filed a writ pe...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Trial Court Order on Court Fee Valuation in Suit for Declaration and Mandatory Injunction. Court holds that when a plaintiff seeks declaration that a document is forged and not binding, the relief is not capable of valuation and court fee is payable under Section 24(d) of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958, not under Section 11(2).

29 Apr 2015

The petitioners, who were plaintiffs in O.S.No.166/2006 before the II Civil Judge at Mysore, filed a suit for declaration that a palupatti dated 8.7.1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Refund of Court Fees in Suit Settled Through Mediation Under Section 89 CPC. Court Holds That Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 Does Not Mandate Refund Upon Settlement Through Alternative Dispute Resolution.

1 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Sanjeevkumar Harakchand Kankariya, entered into an agreement to sell immovable property with respondents No.3 and 4. When the agreemen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Order in Succession Case for Lack of Jurisdiction to Reopen Probate Proceedings. Letters of Administration cannot be revoked under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 without a properly instituted petition and notice to all parties.

2 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Smt. Gajalakshmi, sought Letters of Administration in respect of the last will and testament of her paternal uncle, Radhakrishna Reddy...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)