Search Results for "Kalyan"

837 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 837 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Co-owner's Title in Ancestral Property Despite Consolidation Officer's Order Expunging Name. Section 49 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 Does Not Confer Power to Divest Pre-existing Tenure Holder's Ownership Rights.

The case concerns a dispute over ancestral land in village Mustafabad, Haridwar, originally owned by Angat, who had three sons: Ramji Lal, Khushi Ram,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 307 IPC set aside as the incident arose from a sudden quarrel without premeditation or intention to cause death.

The appellant, Mohammad Azad Alam Diljad Ansari, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, for the offence punishable under Section 307 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Rejection of Petition Under Section 163A MV Act — Claimants Entitled to Compensation as Per Structured Formula Despite Alleged Contributory Negligence.

The appellants, Ashabai, Seema, and Umesh, are the legal representatives of the deceased Kalyan Kothi. They filed a claim petition under Section 163A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Tender Award in Municipal Contract Case for Violation of Tender Conditions and Lack of Transparency. The Court held that the Corporation's decision to award the contract to a technically disqualified bidder was arbitrary and unsustainable.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Kirloskar Brothers Limited (Maharashtra Electro-mech Joint Venture) challenging the tender process conducte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute Between State of Maharashtra and Developer. Court Holds That Existence of Arbitration Clause and Failure of Respondent to Appoint Arbitrator Justifies Appointment Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The State of Maharashtra filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to reso...