Search Results for "Judicial conscience"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Judicial conscience"

1032 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1032 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Review Petitions on Women's Entry to Sabarimala Temple to Larger Bench — Constitutional Questions on Religious Freedom and Essential Practices Require Authoritative Determination by Seven-Judge Bench. The court identified an apparent conflict between Shirur Mutt and Durgah Committee regarding judicial review of essential religious practices under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution.

14 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court, in a judgment dated November 14, 2019, disposed of a batch of review petitions and connected matters arising from the earlier judgm...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Initiates Suo-Motu Criminal Contempt Proceedings in ISKCON Property Dispute – Judge's Integrity Questioned via Anonymous Letter. Court Holds that Sending Photographs with Inflammatory Captions Amounts to Blackmail and Scandalizing the Court, Prima Facie Contempt Under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

16 Apr 2015

The High Court of Karnataka initiated suo-motu criminal contempt proceedings against certain individuals associated with ISKCON and advocates, arising...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court examines legality of appointing persons with criminal background as Ministers. Interpretation of Articles 75 and 164 of the Constitution to uphold democratic integrity and combat criminalisation of politics.

1 Aug 2026

The present writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed as a public interest litigation by the petitioner, Manoj Narula, challenging ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Senior Advocate for Criminal Contempt in Gujarat High Court Case. Scandalous Allegations Against Judiciary and Registry Constitute Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c)(i) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

11 May 2026

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal against the conviction of appellant, President of the Gujarat High Court Advocates' Association and a desig...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Matter to Chief Justice on Advocates' Misconduct in Vexatious SLP Filing. Advocates Filed Second SLP with Incorrect Statements After Dismissal of First, Tendered Unconditional Apology, Leading to Divergent Judicial Opinions Under Supreme Court Rules, 2013.

17 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court was confronted with a case involving misconduct by advocates in filing a vexatious special leave petition. The petitioner, convicted...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officers in Public Interest — Screening Committee's Evaluation Not Arbitrary or Perverse. Rule 74(b)(ii) of Jharkhand Service Code, 2001, allows compulsory retirement after 30 years of service or 50 years of age in public interest; court found no mala fides or perversity in the decision.

27 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by erstwhile judicial officers of Jharkhand challenging their compulsory retirement under Rule 74...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds BCCI's Amenability to Writ Jurisdiction and Applies Public Law Principles to Direct Structural Reforms. Lodha Committee Recommendations for Amending BCCI's Memorandum of Association and Rules to Prevent Conflict of Interest and Ensure Transparency Considered.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court of India, in a sequel to its earlier order dated 22 January 2015 in BCCI v. Cricket Association of Bihar, considered the report and ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Substitution of Penalty in CRPF Disciplinary Case Due to Abuse of Judicial Discretion and Statutory Non-Compliance. Judicial Review Under Article 226 Must Respect Statutory Mandate Under Section 11(1) of the Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 and Rule 27 of the Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955, with Punishment Commensurate to Misconduct Involving Violence and False Allegations.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from disciplinary proceedings against a constable in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) who was charged with misconduct under R...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of District Judge Due to Non-Communication of Adverse Remarks. Adverse CR Entries Without Communication Violate Principles of Natural Justice Under Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008.

16 Nov 2011

The petitioner, a judicial officer, challenged an order dated 26 February 2010 passed by the Principal Secretary and Legal Advisor, Law and Justice De...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Seeking Collegium Transparency in Judicial Appointments — Petition Lacks Cause of Action and Public Interest. Petitioners Failed to Demonstrate Any Personal Injury or Public Wrong, and the Petition Was Vague and Not Maintainable Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

4 Sep 2018

The petitioners, Aravinda Kamath Puttur, V.L. Jagadish, and Prashanth Murthy P., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)