downloaded - 2026-06-17T111817.985
5 Mar 2026The two writ petitions filed by Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd challenged the vires of Rule 39(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and ...
Search Results for "Input Service Distributor"
16 result(s) found
Found 16 result(s)
High Court
High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging GST Order Denying Tax Appropriation and Rectification of Returns. Court Quashes Impugned Order as Without Jurisdiction and Permits Rectification of GST Returns Since Tax Paid Exceeded Proposed Input Tax Credit Reversal with No Revenue Loss Under Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
8 Jan 2026The dispute involved writ petitions challenging GST authorities' orders denying appropriation of tax paid and refusing rectification of returns. The p...
- 248
High Court
GST on Advances for Future Supplies: Examining Constitutional Validity. Evaluating GST's application to unutilized advances and its constitutionality.
14 Nov 2024The L&T IHI Consortium, a collaboration between Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (L&T) and IHI Infrastructure Systems Co. Ltd., Japan, challenged the ...
- 319
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeals and Dismisses Assessees' Writ Petitions in GST Input Tax Credit Case — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of CGST Act. Court holds that denial of ITC on construction of immovable property used for renting is valid and does not violate Articles 14, 19(1)(g), or 300A.
3 Oct 2024The case involves a challenge to the constitutional validity of clauses (c) and (d) of sub-section (5) of Section 17 of the Central Goods and Services...
- 1335
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of GSTR-1 in GST Case Due to Human Error and No Revenue Loss. Rule of purposive interpretation applied to permit correction of inadvertent reporting of wrong GSTINs under Section 37 of CGST Act, 2017.
14 Dec 2023The petitioner, Star Engineers (I) Pvt. Ltd., is a company engaged in manufacturing and supplying electronic components to Bajaj Auto Limited (BAL). D...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Amendment to Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Held Not Retrospective. CESTAT order allowing respondent's appeal upheld as the retrospective amendment by Finance Act, 2010 did not apply to the period prior to its enactment.
24 Aug 2023The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Mumbai East Commissionerate against Larsen & Toubro Limited (HED) under...
- 25
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Works Contract Service Classification Upheld. CENVAT Credit on Input Services for Works Contract Held Inadmissible Under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.
2 May 2023The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at Allahabad dated 09.11.2017, which allo...
- 255
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Transitional Input Tax Credit Under GST — Time Limit for Filing TRAN-1 Form Held Directory, Not Mandatory. The court directed the GST authorities to accept the TRAN-1 Form filed beyond the prescribed time limit, holding that the time limit was directory and the petitioner had sufficient cause for delay.
20 Mar 2020The petitioner, Nelco Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, supplies and undertakes various network-related services. It file...
- 74
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Section 140(3)(iv) of CGST Act on Transitional Credit for Pre-GST Stock. Petitioners Argue Arbitrary Cut-Off Date Leads to Double Taxation and Discrimination.
20 Mar 2018A group of manufacturers and traders, including JCB India Limited, manufacturers of excavators and loaders, filed writ petitions before the Bombay Hig...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Stabilisation of Crude Oil Not 'Manufacture' Under Central Excise Act, 1944. The process of stabilising crude oil on process platforms does not amount to manufacture and stabilised crude oil is not excisable goods.
1 Mar 2013The appellant, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), operates oil wells and process platforms in Mumbai Offshore. The extracted gas-oil mix ...
- 108
