Search Results for "Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act"

394 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 394 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bank Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding — Enquiry Found Fair and Findings Not Perverse. Part-I Award of Industrial Tribunal Confirmed as No Violation of Natural Justice or Principles of Evidence.

The petitioner, Chandrakant Shinde, an employee of Maharashtra Gramin Bank (a Regional Rural Bank established under the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Employees in Industrial Dispute Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946. Employer Failed to Prove Voluntary Abandonment of Service; Termination Without Specific Order Held Illegal.

The petitioner, M/s. Empire Dyeing, a textile processing company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Safai Kamacharis' Petition Against Arbitrary Termination by Municipal Corporation. Contractual Termination Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Right to Livelihood Under Article 21.

The petitioners, nineteen individuals, were working as safai kamacharis (sanitation workers) on a contract basis with the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Termination of Probationer Without Inquiry. Automatic Termination Clause in Appointment Letter Held Invalid as Termination Was Stigmatic and Required Domestic Inquiry Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, WIKA Instruments India Pvt. Ltd., challenged the judgment and award of the Labour Court dated 14 November 2011, which held that the te...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement of Operatives Under Wrong Standing Orders — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court directed to decide whether petitioners are Operatives governed by Standing Order 20-A or non-operatives under Model Standing Orders.

The petitioners, three employees of M/s Kohinoor Mills (a unit of NTC Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Workmen. Employer Failed to Prove Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Workmen Had Completed 240 Days of Service.

The petitioner, Raymond UCO Denim Private Ltd., challenged the order dated 1.1.2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Yavatmal in ULP Complaint No.27 of...