Search Results for "Inadvertent error"

262 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 262 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of PwD-OBC Candidate for MBBS Admission Despite Inadvertent Error in NEET Application Form. Court Directs Admission Based on Disability Certificate and Provisional Selection Letter, Emphasizing Substantive Rights Over Technical Errors Under RPwD Act, 2016.

The petitioner, Shahid Akeel Shaikh, a 20-year-old student with a 40% locomotor disability, filed a writ petition seeking admission to the MBBS course...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of GSTR-1 in GST Case Due to Human Error and No Revenue Loss. Rule of purposive interpretation applied to permit correction of inadvertent reporting of wrong GSTINs under Section 37 of CGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Star Engineers (I) Pvt. Ltd., is a company engaged in manufacturing and supplying electronic components to Bajaj Auto Limited (BAL). D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Excise Duty Case — Licensee Liable for Duty on Liquor Destroyed in Fire. Absolute liability under Rule 7(11)(a) of UP Bottling of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1969 and Rules 708/709 of UP Excise Manual; act of God no defense.

The case arises from a fire incident on 10.04.2003 at the godown of the respondent company, a distillery licensee, which destroyed 35,642 cases of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition Seeking Reassessment of Customs Duty Due to Typographical Error in Customs Tariff Heading. Petitioner's Inadvertent Error in Declaring CTH 85176990 Instead of 85176930 for Routers Entitles Correction Under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, Dimension Data India Private Ltd., an importer, filed five Bills of Entry between 15.03.2019 and 25.04.2019 for importing 48 units of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows DNB Admission Challenge: Admission on Last Date Valid Despite Late Communication to Board. The court held that the cut-off date for admission is the date of actual admission, not the date of communication to the Board, and directed registration of the petitioners.

The petitioners, two doctors, challenged the communication by the National Board of Examinations (NBE) declaring their admission to the Post Graduate ...