Search Results for "Import Restrictions"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Import Restrictions"

155 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 155 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Import Restriction for Areca Nuts — Condition Requiring NOC from FSSAI Held Ultra Vires. Import Policy Condition Violates Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of Constitution as It Lacks Statutory Authority and Is Disproportionate.

2 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Siddhi Vinayak, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1913, engaged in the import of areca nuts (commonly kn...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Advance Authorizations for Import of Areca Nuts — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind. Import of Areca Nuts under Advance Authorization Scheme for Export of Betel Nuts (Supari) Held Permissible Under Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020.

24 Jul 2018

The petitioners, Taj Agro Commodities Pvt. Ltd., Shadi-Ram & Sons Pvt. Ltd., and Himatlal Hirji & Co., were granted advance authorizations under the F...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Advance Authorizations Under Foreign Trade Policy — Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind by DGFT. The court quashed cancellation orders and directed fresh hearing, holding that quasi-judicial authorities must follow principles of natural justice before revoking licenses under the Foreign Trade Policy.

13 Jul 2018

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by Taj Agro Commodities Pvt. Ltd., Shadi-Ram & Sons Pvt. Ltd., and Himatlal Hirji & Co. challengin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question Whether Mere Membership of a Banned Organization is Punishable Under Section 10 of UAPA, 1967 — Earlier Decisions in Arup Bhuyan and Raneef Holding That Mere Membership Does Not Incriminate Without Violence or Incitement Are Reconsidered as Union of India Was Not Heard.

24 Mar 2023

This judgment arises from a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court of India, questioning the correctness of the decisions in Arup Bhuyan v. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against RBI Guidelines Prohibiting Merchanting Trade in Banned Goods During Pandemic. Clause 2(iii) of the 2020 MTT Guidelines is a reasonable restriction under Article 19(6) as it serves the legitimate aim of preserving domestic PPE stocks and is not manifestly arbitrary.

6 Dec 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court upholding Clause 2(iii) of the Revised Guidelines on Merchanting Trade Transactions ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

23 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Import Licence Restriction and Show Cause Notice in DEEC Scheme Case — Import Policy Restriction on Rubber Chemicals Upheld. Court held that the clarification restricting CIF value to 7% of FOB value of exports was valid and the show cause notice for short levy under Customs Act, 1962 was maintainable.

4 May 2005

The petitioner, M/s A.V. Industries, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, is a fully export-oriented unit manufacturing aut...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court's Quashing of Import Fee on Rectified Spirit Used for Potable Liquor. Levy Held Valid as Regulatory Fee Under Jharkhand Excise Act, 1915, as Rectified Spirit Used for Manufacture of Intoxicating Liquor Falls Within State's Legislative Competence Under Entry 8 List II.

2 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Jharkhand against the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which had quashed a notification...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Seizure of Poppy Seeds Under NDPS Act — Poppy Seeds Not 'Opium' or 'Opium Derivative' Under Section 2(xvi) and 2(xvii) of NDPS Act, 1985. Poppy seeds are expressly excluded from the definition of 'poppy straw' under Section 2(xviiid) and are not covered by any definition under the NDPS Act, making their seizure illegal.

28 Aug 2019

The petitioners, Chailbihari Trading Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition challenging the seizure of poppy seeds (khas-khas) by the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Prosecution for Export of Antiquities — Prosecution Under Customs Act Not Barred by Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972. Held that the Customs Act, 1962 applies alongside the Antiquities Act, and prosecution under Sections 132 and 135 is maintainable.

27 Feb 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court upholding the discharge of the respondent, Sharad Gandhi, from offences under Sections 132 an...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)