Search Results for "ITAT Rules"

68 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 68 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court in Capital Gains Tax Case — Accrual Occurs on Date of Award, Not Notification. Transfer of Capital Asset Under Section 45 of Income-tax Act, 1961 Is Complete Only When Compensation Is Determined by Collector's Award, Even if Possession Taken Earlier.

The case concerns the assessment year 1971-1972 for the assessee Amrik Singh HUF, whose land was acquired by the Haryana Government for a college play...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Revenue's Appeals in Income Tax Block Assessment Case - Upholds Addition of Unexplained Cash Credits Under Section 68 of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of cash credits, reversing the Tribunal's order.

The Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Lower Division Clerks in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Challenging Denial of Annual Increment. Held that increment earned for service rendered in preceding year cannot be denied merely because employee proceeded on leave without allowance or was on probation.

The petitioners, nine Lower Division Clerks working in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the denial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Lower Division Clerks Seeking Equal Pay for Equal Work. Petitioners, Regularized Ad Hoc Employees, Entitled to Same Pay Scale as Direct Recruits Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, nine Lower Division Clerks working in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the denial of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Income Tax Matter Involving India-China DTAA Interpretation. Petitioner's Claim for NIL Withholding Tax Certificate Rejected Due to Pending Assessments and Previous Tax Determinations Under Section 197 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The dispute involved a Chinese company, Petitioner, which provided technical services to its Indian subsidiary, Benteler India Private Limited, under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Depreciation on Original Cost in Amalgamation Case Under Rule 10 of Income Tax Rules. Notional Depreciation to Non-Resident Parent Does Not Reduce Written Down Value for Successor Company.

The case involves an Income Tax Reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from the assessment years 1976-77, 1977-78, and 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Disabled Army Veteran as ITAT Member -- Quashes Compulsory Retirement Finding Mala Fide Actions and Departmental Vendetta -- Upholds SCSC Recommendations in Writ Petition Under Article 32

The Supreme Court allowed a writ petition filed by Captain Pramod Kumar Bajaj against the Union of India and another respondent -- The petitioner, a d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tax Appeal Against ITAT Order for Lack of Reasoning and Failure to Decide Legal Issue. Tribunal's Remand of Deduction Dispute Under Section 33AC of Income Tax Act Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Rule 27 of ITAT Rules.

The appellant, New Era Shipping Ltd., challenged an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 19.07.2011. The ITAT had set aside the Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...