Search Results for "IGRC order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "IGRC order"

11 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Electricity Company's Petition Challenging CGRF Order Directing Refund of Differential Tariff. Reclassification of Petrol Pump from Industrial to Commercial Tariff Upheld as Per Commercial Circular No.175 and MERC Tariff Order; CGRF Exceeded Jurisdiction by Not Considering Limitation Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003.

27 Apr 2026

The petitioner, the Executive Engineer and Nodal Officer of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., challenged the order dated 29.06....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petitions Challenging CGRF Orders on Recovery of Additional Charges from Consumers. MERC Orders on FAC and AEC Recovery Upheld as Binding on Distribution Licensee.

16 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed a group of writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against MSEDCL for Refund of Infrastructure Costs Under DDF Category. Consumer Definition Under Electricity Act, 2003 Includes Persons Supplied Electricity for Layout Development.

10 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Smt. Savita Chandrashekhar Thodage, applied to the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) for a new electric...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Non-Delivery of Shares and Limitation Were Not Perverse or Contrary to Law.

4 May 2021

The appellant, M/s Satish K. Narang & Co., an investor, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against the ju...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Section 9 Petition in Part Recognizing IGRC Order as Conciliation Settlement Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court ruled that the IGRC order, with mutual acknowledgment, constitutes a settlement agreement under Sections 73 and 74 of the Act, and the petitioner must pursue civil remedies against respondents not party to the exchange bye-laws' dispute resolution mechanism.

19 Mar 2021

The dispute arose from commodity futures trading where Titan Co. Ltd., a company dealing in watches and jewellery, engaged Karvy Comtrade Ltd., a comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL Petition Against CGRF Interest Order in Tariff Refund Dispute. Interest on Differential Tariff Amount Not Payable Absent Specific Provision in Regulations or Agreement.

17 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged an order dated 25 January 2018 passed by the Consumer ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Electricity Ombudsman's Order Allowing Refund of Excess Tariff Charged to Industrial Consumer. Limitation Period Under MERC Regulations Not Applicable to Continuing Wrong of Wrongful Billing at Commercial Tariff Instead of Industrial Tariff.

18 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged the order dated 22/01/2016 passed by the Electricity O...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Electricity Dispute Over Pre-Deposit Amount Under Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003. Court Holds That Consumer Must Deposit Lesser of Two Amounts Under Section 56(1)(a) or (b) Before Approaching Internal Grievance Redressal Cell.

16 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Sanjay Automobile Engineers Pvt Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune, which...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute for Lack of Reasons and Non-Consideration of Margin Requirements. Award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 set aside as Arbitrator failed to consider deposit and margin obligations of client.

27 Feb 2012

The Petitioner, Anand Rathi Share and Stock Brokers Ltd., a share and stock broker and member of NSE, challenged an arbitral award dated 15 October 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Constituent in Stock Trading Dispute — Technical Glitch Not a Valid Defense for Non-Execution of Order. The Court held that the Arbitrator's findings on facts and law were not patently illegal and did not warrant interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Feb 2010

The petitioner, M/s. Angel Broking Limited, a trading member of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration ...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)